MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
> Just Switched To Mac, What Sequencer Should I Use?, Cubase SX? Cubase SL? MOTU DP? Protools?
Kyle
post Mon 17 Feb 2003, 17:02
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 17-Feb 03
From: Alpharetta - US
Member No.: 12,515




Hey everybody. I just recently switched from a PC to my wonderful new PowerMac duel 1.25GHz G4. While on PC I used Cakewalk Pro Audio 9 and Sonar for all my recording/sequencing. Now that I'm on a mac, what should I look into? I seem to have noticed that the big players are Protools 6, MOTU Digital Performer, and Cubase. Any others I should look into? Thanks in advance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
rickenbacker
post Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:06
Post #2


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 645
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Broughton
Member No.: 4,705




Ahem, LPM, I don't know if I'd call Cubase SX "less pro". It already has certain features that Logic seem to have "borrowed" for the 6 update. smile.gif

Plus SX is VST compatible, which opens you up to a whole world of plug-ins that Logic simply can't use (BTW Kyle, Pro Tools plugs are often VERY expensive - disproportionately so).

Logic is very good: SX is very good. Personally, I prefer the interface of SX - it's been much easier to get into with and I'm working quicker than I ever was with Logic. I know I'm in the minority here, but it suits me.

I still like Logic, particularly the vintage synth collection (EVB3, EVD6, EVP88), but having the option to go VST and use plugs like the PSP mastering collection with SX is very welcome.

As for Digital Performer, well they seem to have a terrible record on updates...

My two cents, anyway. biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Kyle   Just Switched To Mac, What Sequencer Should I Use?   Mon 17 Feb 2003, 17:02
- - iman   Hey kyle, i'm new to this myself (recent purch...   Mon 17 Feb 2003, 23:09
- - lepetitmartien   Welcome! Now on the sequencers: If you ne...   Mon 17 Feb 2003, 23:48
- - Kyle   Sounds great! Thanks for all the suggestions. ...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 00:07
- - garysome1   lepetitmartien, I'm curious, what leads you to...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 05:40
- - stergz   One thing to note about Pro Tools 6, is that you c...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 07:05
- - lepetitmartien   QUOTE (Kyle @ Feb 18 2003, 00:07)but what abo...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 16:44
- - rickenbacker   QUOTE I think that if you can, you should really h...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 17:42
- - Kyle   Once again, wonderful feedback. I have now removed...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 17:50
- - lepetitmartien   You'll can still use PT free when it'll be...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 23:47
- - anarchosyn   Kyle, it really comes down to what you feel you...   Wed 19 Feb 2003, 05:52
- - rickenbacker   Kyle: I don't know where you're based, but...   Wed 19 Feb 2003, 12:37
- - sazerac   Just thought I'd add my two cents - I started ...   Wed 19 Feb 2003, 18:07
- - liquidh2o   if you decide to go the Cubase route, I have the f...   Sat 8 Mar 2003, 13:58
- - mook noodler   Hey Kyle, Steinberg has a demo version of Cubase S...   Wed 12 Mar 2003, 05:50
- - hanikfashhou   I have a 1.25GHz Dual Processort, I'm running ...   Wed 12 Mar 2003, 11:19
- - rickenbacker   I side with hanik over SX, but I'd go further ...   Wed 12 Mar 2003, 12:59
- - lepetitmartien   hanikfashhou cubase has had midi timing problems f...   Thu 13 Mar 2003, 03:47
- - hanikfashhou   Rickenbacker, unfortunately I havent used SX for r...   Fri 14 Mar 2003, 02:36
- - horselesspaul   Kyle, Can I just add that the oft aired Logic is w...   Fri 14 Mar 2003, 09:16


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Thu 30 May 2024, 13:47
- © MacMusic 1997-2008