MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
> Soundtrack and GarageBand: Compared, Apple
_news_
post Wed 28 Jan 2004, 01:45
Post #1





Visitors







Comments about:

Soundtrack and GarageBand: Compared
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
lepetitmartien
post Wed 28 Jan 2004, 23:16
Post #2


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group Icon

Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758




You're so right Peter smile.gif

The fact something is not "new" doesn't mean it's not needed… GB or something of the sort was needed for a long time. It's time people actually USE it (or not wink.gif, instead of muttering in automatic for good or bad reasons.

Let's criticize or pray the product but on it, not on marketing blablah or Evil Empire/Good Boys rant. It'll be much more interesting and insightful.

Now don't count on me, it won't run on my computer blink.gif rolleyes.gif

(unfortunately)


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- news   Soundtrack and GarageBand: Compared   Wed 28 Jan 2004, 01:45
- - SittinOnTheFence   An interesting comparison would be GB and ACID... ...   Wed 28 Jan 2004, 01:45
- - peterkirn   Agreed, BUT: Acid doesn't include soft synths...   Wed 28 Jan 2004, 06:06


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Mon 31 Mar 2025, 17:12
- © 440 Forums 2011