MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ardour Takes DAW Open Source, Music Software
_news_
post Tue 27 Jan 2004, 23:18
Post #1





Visitors







Comments about:

Ardour Takes DAW Open Source
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tencentcat
post Tue 27 Jan 2004, 23:18
Post #2


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 28-Jul 03
From: Denton - US
Member No.: 22,035




Anyone see how to get this into OS X? the website only speaks of linux. looks interesting otherwise.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peterkirn
post Wed 28 Jan 2004, 06:02
Post #3


Member
Group Icon

Group: Active Members
Posts: 92
Joined: 30-Sep 02
From: New York - US
Member No.: 8,113




Read their site again -- there's an OS X version, too. :-)

Yes, this was originally a Linux project, but it's now available OS X native, with support for Core Audio. And OS X and Linux have that in common: they access device drivers through an OS-level layer, so apps don't have to natively support individual hardware. What you evidently lose running under OS X is the Linux-specific open source plugins, as near as I can tell. Though if you want that, you can install Yellow Dog Linux on Mac OS X and run Linux software natively.

I'm going to investigate further and try this for myself; I'll let you know how it goes!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
post Wed 28 Jan 2004, 23:10
Post #4


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group Icon

Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758




You need to compile yourself the code for OSX, so it's not for unix illiterate, yet not unreachable.

Peter, Soif has an eye on it, you could ask him wink.gif

We came to the idea in the FR forums to make the compiling and either give it to the developers else to host it in a package form so easy to install for endusers on MM. Stay in touch smile.gif cool.gif wink.gif

Now, I will repeat myself, it's beta version, so tread carefully with it. But it's sure damn interesting smile.gif


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peterkirn
post Thu 29 Jan 2004, 00:29
Post #5


Member
Group Icon

Group: Active Members
Posts: 92
Joined: 30-Sep 02
From: New York - US
Member No.: 8,113




Ah, yes, they sort of assume that we're used to doing that (compiling). It's not so big a problem.

I should add, too, while Linux Jack doesn't work on OS X, you could use Ardour with Jack Tools which Dan Negrin DID port to OS X with the same basic capabilities of Jack in Linux but for Core Audio!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dnigrin
post Thu 29 Jan 2004, 17:00
Post #6


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 07-Jan 04
From: - US
Member No.: 32,676




Just to be clear, *I* didn't do the port to OS X, that was the work of Stephane Letz and Johnny Petrantoni. I did the testing, wrote the documentation, setup the web site, and did the mass public relations campaign. ;-)

Also, please note that the current release version of Jack Tools at http://www.jackosx.com is compiled using an older version of Jack. I believe this means that Ardour will not work properly with the current OS X Jack package that we supply.

We will soon be updating our Jack Tools package for OS X to use the latest Jack release though, so soon that limitation will go away.

Thanks,
Dan
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peterkirn
post Thu 29 Jan 2004, 19:06
Post #7


Member
Group Icon

Group: Active Members
Posts: 92
Joined: 30-Sep 02
From: New York - US
Member No.: 8,113




Hey Dan, thanks for the correction and thanks for reading. Please do keep us posted; either email me or post directly to news and we'll make sure we keep up with Jack Tools and other developments.

Linux app support is a big deal for those of us who teach computer music, too: schools have extremely limited budgets for purchasing software, and cross-platform open source software means we can also advise our students to get the software on their own. It means they can work on homework away from the lab if they desire, they can continue to use apps after a class, and they can afford software without piracy. Weighs heavily on my mind, at least.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dnigrin
post Thu 29 Jan 2004, 19:33
Post #8


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 07-Jan 04
From: - US
Member No.: 32,676




Will definitely keep you and everyone posted about our developments. Also, if you're inclined, subscribe to our Yahoo discussion group, for the latest info and discussion about Jack on OS X - the link is at jackosx.com

Dan
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jnanadev
post Wed 4 Feb 2004, 21:22
Post #9


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 29-Sep 03
From: Cupertino - US
Member No.: 25,717




UI needs some serious work. This looks like a windoze app from Win 95 days...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peterkirn
post Wed 4 Feb 2004, 22:23
Post #10


Member
Group Icon

Group: Active Members
Posts: 92
Joined: 30-Sep 02
From: New York - US
Member No.: 8,113




Well, that's the thing with the UNIX apps -- users accustomed to the refined look of the modern UI may be put off. (And, incidentally, that's because Windows95 looked not only like a Mac rip-off but a UNIX GUI rip-off, as well.)

Keep in mind, though, open source, lacking the huge cost of commercial software -- think about academic institutions on a budget, etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Wed 27 Nov 2024, 12:17
- © 440 Forums 2011