  |
 Which Imac To Get? |
 Fri 30 Mar 2007, 19:52
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 23-Mar 06 From: Venice - US Member No.: 78,568  |
I'm setting up a composing/recording setup for home. It;ll be built around Digital Performer or the new Logic when it comes out, and I'll be using a lot of virtual instruments. I can get a good deal on slightly used core duo 2.16 imacs now ($1k for a 20" or $1300 for a 24") or I'm wondering if I should wait for the new generation that will be out in a few months.
Can the current ones give me the horsepower I need, or should I wait? Thoughts? Thanks all! *$%($*(@!! is online now Report Post Edit/Delete Message |
 |
 
|
|
Sat 31 Mar 2007, 23:47
Post
#2
|
|
 Advanced Member  Group: Members Posts: 479 Joined: 08-May 05 From: Portland - US Member No.: 65,373 |
I think that it mostly depends on what you want to do music wise RIGHT NOW. If you already have a setup and not buying a new computer is not holding you up from working then stick with what you got and wait. For whatever its worth there will be minor bugs in the next generation that will take 3 to 6 months to really iron out between the hardware and software people so waiting for the next big thing is not always the best idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Sun 1 Apr 2007, 04:18
Post
#3
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 23-Mar 06 From: Venice - US Member No.: 78,568 |
Yeah, kind of what I was thinking. I have DP4.5 and could get an imac now and upgrade to dp5.0 and see if I get used to it, or wait till the new macs come out. When you refer to the next generation do you mean the new macs, or the new logic, or both? I think the biggest reason I'm thinking of waiting for the new imacs is I want to use a lot of virtual instruments, and the imacs have a limit of 3 gigs of ram. But i'd like to stick with imacs, because, for this generation anyway, they seem to give the most band for the buck....I haven't been composing or recroding the last few years, but am eager to get back into it. I just want the setup to be as optimal as I can get it when I start back up.
This post has been edited by lepetitmartien: Sun 1 Apr 2007, 16:39 |
|
|
|
|
Sun 1 Apr 2007, 16:41
Post
#4
|
|
 Moderator In Chief (MIC)  Group: Editors Posts: 15,189 Joined: 23-Dec 01 From: Paris - FR Member No.: 2,758 |
Given the way the lines are revamped, if you way for the next big thing, you'll wait forever. Right now the iMacs are reliable, so it's better to have one now and work on it than wait for later hardware where problem may occur.
Now, you should really add into your budget the RAM to add, as you'll need some more! And the mandatory external drive for audio, of course… -------------------- Our Classifeds • Nos petites annonces • Terms Of Service / Conditions d'Utilisation • Forum Rules / Règles des Forums • MacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki? BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki? |
|
|
|
|
Tue 20 May 2008, 23:50
Post
#5
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 20-May 08 From: Chatsworth - US Member No.: 101,178 |
I know this thread is a little old and some several newer iterations of imacs have been released, but I'm curious about the performance differences between say a 2.4 ghz and a 2.8 ghz. Is it worth the several hundred dollars extra?
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 21 May 2008, 07:20
Post
#6
|
|
|
Rookie Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 09-Oct 07 From: Bogangar - AU Member No.: 95,714 |
Get the mac with the quickest processor , most ram and biggest HD.
The computer is the least of your main considerations. If you are intending on Audio Recording you need to get an Audio Interface that keeps up with their drivers upon new releases of OS. Everyone is awaiting OS 10.3 so, you need software and an interface that is fully compatable. Then you need an external HD to save your audio projects to that has a spin speed of 7200. Glyph is the go. In answer to your question , the processor is an integral component of your DAW. Do yourself a favour , and fully reseach the software and interface forward compatability with Mac. Universal Binary code is not one of the favoured flavours of software and hardware developers. A fool proof system would be Logic Studio 8 and an Apogee Duet and a number crunching mac. If you are using midi be very mindfull of ongoing bugs with Cubase 4.1.3 , and firewire devices with the current Mac OS. Be patient and wait for full compatability with 10.5.3. Logic is now owned and developed by Mac , so they have a vested interest in full compatability. Good Luck Tweed Music |
|
|
|
|
Wed 21 May 2008, 10:22
Post
#7
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 348 Joined: 10-Feb 06 From: Hamburg - DE Member No.: 76,633 |
Forgot2Panic
"I know this thread is a little old and some several newer iterations of imacs have been released, but I'm curious about the performance differences between say a 2.4 ghz and a 2.8 ghz. Is it worth the several hundred dollars extra"? No. |
|
|
|
|
Wed 21 May 2008, 20:47
Post
#8
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 20-May 08 From: Chatsworth - US Member No.: 101,178 |
Thanks tweed for your detailed response and macdaddy for your succient one.
I'm certainly looking to get some basic gear with the imac, including an external drive (I'll be looking into Glyphs) and a midi controller. I already have Reason 4 and have decided to check out Logic after hearing less than stellar comments about Cubase running on mac. It'll still be a while before I make the purchase and I plan on doing a good deal more research beforehand. I definitely want the best system I can afford, but I don't want to pay a big chunk of money more for power I don't need or won't show a significant improvement in performance. I'm sure I'll be asking more questions before I make the move to mac. Thanks again. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
