Studio Projects C1 Vs Audio Technia At4040, Which one for my saffire??? |
|
|
|
Sat 18 Mar 2006, 14:02
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 12-Jan 06
From: Melbourne - AU
Member No.: 75,204
|
Hi all! I've heard all about the C1 sounding like a U87 (i have no idea what that sounds like, but it sounds like it sounds good ) But I've also read good reviews about the AT4040 and i think it looks better and more 'trustable' Opinions please! ANY opinons welcome Im going to use it with a saffire for recording my voice (male vocals)
|
|
|
|
|
Tue 21 Mar 2006, 05:46
|
Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758
|
VTB1 is the pre From test at friend's, we could have the C1 along U67 and 2 different U87 (one needing maybe some check up, the other top notch). It did nicely. To be precise, on the recording made to test (cello, my voice -bass baryton-, melodica)(sorry, it was what was needed then) the C1 was less noisy, somewhat airier, better dynamics and transients and the difference was evident, C1 was also a bit more bright. Now, I won't say for all use it'll be better instead of a 87. The 2 U47 were not on display that day so we couldn't compare (true btw The pre used were both high end stuff, though I don't remember the makes, sorry. (2 different sessions, all takes thru the same pre each time, recorded in Pro Tools, listened A/B) I'm a strong advocate of the C1, now I can't help out of the AT4040 as I don't have listened to it in the same conditions… jdimitri, what's your voice? Bass, barytone, tenor?
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Tue 21 Mar 2006, 06:05
|
Member
Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 10-Feb 02
From: Huntsville, AL
Member No.: 3,371
|
QUOTE (lepetitmartien @ Mar 20 2006, 22:46) jdimitri, what's your voice? Bass, barytone, tenor? OK, I was about to ask, "where in the world did you find a baryton?" Then I realized you meant baritone... your voice... (A "baryton" is an Elizabethian-era orchestra instrument. As near as I can figure, it's sort of a cross between a double bass and a Hamer 12-string bass. I've never actually seen one, just pictures.)
--------------------
Dave Cornutt
|
|
|
|
|
Tue 21 Mar 2006, 07:14
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 12-Jan 06
From: Melbourne - AU
Member No.: 75,204
|
Im a pop-rock singer so umm watever goes from a deep-ish voice to high falsetto... I'm not going to get a pre so the saffire's pre is all about its going to get
|
|
|
|
|
Tue 21 Mar 2006, 20:05
|
Rookie
Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 20-May 04
From: Ottawa - CA
Member No.: 43,617
|
QUOTE (jdimitri @ Mar 18 2006, 13:02) Hi all! I've heard all about the C1 sounding like a U87 (i have no idea what that sounds like, but it sounds like it sounds good ) But I've also read good reviews about the AT4040 and i think it looks better and more 'trustable' Opinions please! ANY opinons welcome Im going to use it with a saffire for recording my voice (male vocals) A C1 does sound like a U87, in the sense that both have a clear, open high-end, and are suited to voices that are not prone to sibilance (like mine is), or that need some added clarity in the highs. The C1 (and the U87) often excel on smooth female voices, since the high end is very flattering, but as soon as you switch to someone with a thin voice, watch out because you're going to end up emphasizing the wrong frequencies. But the C1 ISN'T a U87. While the frequency response is good, the U87 has a certain something that the C1 doesn't. The U87 can give you almost a stereo sound from a single mic, if that makes sense. But for 1/8th the price, the C1 is 90% there. The AT4040 is a much pricier mic than the C1, and also very nice. It doesn't have quite the same high-end pattern as a C1, but is in the same sonic league, IMHO. I own a C1, and I use it every day. Its not perfect for my voice, but on songs that are lower in my range, it can work very nicely. Its ok on acoustic guitar, but again this depends on the tone you get from the specific instrument. I've used the 4040 a few times (though I dont own one), and found it to be very nice. But I don't have enough experience to tell you to get it or not. I love my C1, but its not for everything. BTW, the Studio Projects VTB1 preamp really makes the C1 sing, and fattens it up a bit. Recommended.
|
|
|
|
|
Tue 11 Jul 2006, 23:59
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 12-Jan 06
From: Melbourne - AU
Member No.: 75,204
|
Well... I haven't got anything yet But go to www.myspace.com/softcorerock and listen to drugs don't work (me singing) Maybe you can tell me which one would suit me better then? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 13 Jul 2006, 02:53
|
Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758
|
Start with an allrounder if it's your first mic as I believe. If you plan to gig, go sm57, it's not original but it can't be destroyed by human means You'll can go for something else later. The others named here should be great too. If there's a shop around where you are where you can try mic (there must be shops like that in Melbourne , I strongly advise you to try a few in the US$150-250 range. Your fellows aussies from Rode have nice stuff working great, it should be available easily. Another point, if you can, try the guitar with too, so you can have both! Do not invest for a higher price tag as it's not worth paying $$$ for a mic and not plug it into a decent pre/audio chain. What's the pre you use now?
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 13 Jul 2006, 04:40
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 12-Jan 06
From: Melbourne - AU
Member No.: 75,204
|
Umm im using no pre... I have an SM57 n an SM58 (hoo doesnt) and im currently using them to record guitar and vocals So im gunna keep using SM57 for guitars (acoustic n electric) and maybe piano and either of these mics is just going to be for vocals... Maybe i'll get a cheap pre soon... VTB1 or maybe presonus tubepre or... blue tube... suggestions for pre would be appreciated too
This post has been edited by jdimitri: Thu 13 Jul 2006, 04:59
|
|
|
|
4 User(s) are reading this topic (4 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|