MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Motu 828mkII goes to USB, Computer Hardware
_news_
post Fri 2 Dec 2005, 22:37
Post #1





Visitors







Comments about:

Motu 828mkII goes to USB
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeffason
post Fri 2 Dec 2005, 22:37
Post #2


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 28-Aug 04
From: Santa Barbara - US
Member No.: 49,724




Usb ...yuk
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
swilder
post Sat 3 Dec 2005, 05:14
Post #3


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 127
Joined: 22-Aug 03
From: Greenwood - US
Member No.: 23,402




I second that. Welcome to the Microsoft effect. Microsoft gets behind USB2 and every mobo maker puts it on their product for that sole reason. And a la peanut butter sandwich - instant standard!

The fact of the matter is that us audio freaks make up a very small portion of the buying public. Most people are just gonna use the connectors that their puters come with. Oh well. Their loss.

Scott
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kaboombahchuck
post Sat 3 Dec 2005, 14:05
Post #4


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 495
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Chandler - US
Member No.: 2,003




USB + Audio = Death.

Why would any end user torture themselves that way?

BTW I use a MOTU 828 mkll (firewire, that is.). tongue.gif


--------------------
kaboombahchuck
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
quelme
post Sat 3 Dec 2005, 15:14
Post #5


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 03-Dec 05
From: Eddington - US
Member No.: 73,364




Hi from a newbie to Macmusic. I have two Motu 828, one mk!! the other the original model.
I want to transfer 16 tracks from two ADAT tape players to my G4. Do I hook up each 8 track deck to a separate 828? Is there a trick to getting the 828 to sync? Please help.java script:emoticon(':-/')
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mortalengines
post Sun 4 Dec 2005, 10:37
Post #6


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 479
Joined: 08-May 05
From: Portland - US
Member No.: 65,373




I understand that USB 2.0 is actually pretty fast & It is actually faster than firewire 400 - I don't know that it's any faster than firewire 800 but I am not even sure if there are that many interfaces that even support firewire 800.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bls2112
post Mon 27 Mar 2006, 18:27
Post #7


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 27-Mar 06
From: Westfield - US
Member No.: 78,682




USB2 is NOT, and I repeat, is NOT faster than Firewire 400...
Yes USB2 is 480mbs as compared to Firewire400's 400mbs...That is a difference of 80mbs...
The catch is that USB2 sucks a considerably higher amount of system resources as compared to Firewire...Hence, making it far less stable...As well as taking a considerable amount of performance from the system's CPU, RAM, etc...
Don't believe me(?)....Research it...Or worse yet, try it...
All and all USB is for mice, keyboards, etc...And NOT pro multi-track audio...
One to four tracks at a time...Maybe...
USB SUCKS (In a literal sense)
Although all this being said...MOTU was just offering what people (And only God knows why) were asking for...
And i give the company a thumbs up for making that offer yet keeping the "old" and far superior Firewire 828MKII...
'nough said...
My rant is over...lol
All the best....Barry ';o)

PS: The RME Fireface is the only true Firewire 800 interface I know of...
My recommendation...?
Metric-Halo all the way...Well worth the extra $...
Although MOTU is the best bang for the buck...

This post has been edited by bls2112: Mon 27 Mar 2006, 18:27
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
post Mon 27 Mar 2006, 21:17
Post #8


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group Icon

Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758




FW 400 = 400 Mbs (theory)
USB 2.0 = 480 Mbs (ditto)
FW 800 = 800 Mbs (ter)

Save USB is not efficient as a streaming protocol, at the opposite of firewire. Fw just work better. CPU load is also something to think about as bls2112 pointed out.

There is a reason why you get a small number of tracks at the same time on USB 1 and 2 in regard to the current 16 in FW 400.


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeffason
post Mon 27 Mar 2006, 22:27
Post #9


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 28-Aug 04
From: Santa Barbara - US
Member No.: 49,724




I have owned two USB audio devices and used with a mac. Totally unreliable. CPU spikes WILL cause audio dropouts. I would advise against anyone purchasing a USB audio interface, regardless of the number of channels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Fri 22 Nov 2024, 12:02
- © 440 Forums 2011