MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
> M Box Users
nlowther
post Mon 31 May 2004, 12:55
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 09-Apr 04
From: Sydney - AU
Member No.: 40,556




Hey all you MBox users out there.
I want the to get the Mbox 'cause Pro tools is great for what I want . Only thing is Ive been toid by some people that it cant run Virtual Instruments without noticeable latency and chews up processor speed real quick when adding effects.
Tell me its not true, tell me simplicity rules and keep away from the maze that is Logic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
arvidtp
post Wed 2 Jun 2004, 15:34
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 249
Joined: 21-Feb 03
From: Providence - US
Member No.: 12,850




Powerbook G4 1.25GHz 15", OS 10.3(.4 now). I admit that I should get more RAM for optimal performance, but still it should be better than it is, and at least be stable and all...

The Driver issue is that Digi uses their own "Direct IO" drivers that are not part of the operating system, but are based precariously on extra kernel extensions - that is so an OS 9-like thing to do. That is why it keeps breaking when Apple updates OS X, when other software like reason, logic, etc keeps going strong. I don't think it has to do with DV, because it is more a IO thing than a file format thing. But I'm not knowledgeable in the video thing (I like and can use FCP, but couldn't figure out what the hell I was doing when I tried Avid!). And FCPro could use the Mbox for output in theory. However that brings me to another point:

Myself, and several other computer musicians I know who have been around a lot longer than I, feel that Digidesign wants to LIMIT the use of their hardware with other software - to make it as difficult as possible for you to try software other than Pro TOols and possibly realize that it is not all there is to making music on a computer, while still being able to say that they make compatible products. Why else the "single client" nature of the mbox/001/002 coreaudio drivers, when Digi as a big company is completely capable of making a good, normal, multi-client, stable coreaudio driver? Without you having to add apps to a list before using them, with some of them either not working at all or crashing 30 sec after launch because of Mbox (i.e. stable and respected software like reason)? And for goodness sakes the lowest latency on that driver is 512 samples! I can't very well use that to perform with for the instruments I build in MaxMSP! I'm really frustrated with them. Pro TOols is great software for what it is (except when it crashes) but the limitations it and its hardware dependencies impose get me really frustrated.

Sorry to have to bash Digi, but I think its a shame for those of us who want to experiment with other stuff besides what Digi wants us to use. Maybe you will have better luck with the Mbox drivers as far as stability, but I think I know how to maintain a mac, and the limitations I have stated are real.


--------------------
-Arvid •• Squish the Squid Productions, Modest Machine

•• digitally augmented trumpet, TOOB, flugelhorn, cracklebox, percussicube, no-input-mixers and Macbook Pro, 2.4 GHz 15", MacOS 10.5, MOTU Ultralite, Logic Studio 9, MaxMSP 5, JackOSX ••
•• Electronic-experimental, jazz, digital instrument design, electronics, unique software and performance.••
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- nlowther   M Box Users   Mon 31 May 2004, 12:55
- - arvidtp   Unfortunately I can't tell you it's not tr...   Mon 31 May 2004, 17:01
- - Lord Pasty   Hrmmm... I'm thinking about getting an MBox. ...   Tue 1 Jun 2004, 03:43
- - nlowther   I didnt know about the driver issues, maybe its so...   Wed 2 Jun 2004, 13:22
- - Lord Pasty   This info distresses me!!! The MBox i...   Wed 2 Jun 2004, 21:24
- - macyu   Yeah I also hear to stay away from Cubase.. I dunn...   Wed 2 Jun 2004, 21:31
- - Lord Pasty   Exactly, macyu. It seems like it would be best to...   Thu 3 Jun 2004, 02:41
- - MrDee   I did just that a while ago for uni... i bought a ...   Thu 3 Jun 2004, 13:29
- - arvidtp   Bravo MrDee. I concur. The single client thing is...   Thu 3 Jun 2004, 13:51
- - MrDee   Lol while i'm on the issue... True true true,...   Thu 3 Jun 2004, 14:11
- - Lord Pasty   Well, I still have a problem here, if I may again ...   Fri 4 Jun 2004, 02:55
- - MrDee   Note that the version of reason you get with the b...   Fri 4 Jun 2004, 04:20
- - Lord Pasty   HAHA! That's what it comes down to, I sup...   Fri 4 Jun 2004, 04:29
- - nlowther   Well I suppose from what yo've all said Logic ...   Fri 4 Jun 2004, 09:14
- - arvidtp   hey, its not all bad - things are looking up aroun...   Fri 4 Jun 2004, 13:52
- - Lord Pasty   Arvid! Make sure to post on how things are go...   Fri 4 Jun 2004, 14:28
- - lepetitmartien   First checks on the new drivers in the FR forums a...   Sat 5 Jun 2004, 17:13
- - arvidtp   For once the mbox coreaudio driver doesn't com...   Sun 6 Jun 2004, 05:35
- - MrDee   Yay! Digidesign has moved to the year 1999...   Mon 7 Jun 2004, 01:36
- - abcdaniel   I AgRee MrDee. Thank´s digi, but come on digi...   Mon 7 Jun 2004, 18:42
- - majn   Yeah. I'm using a G4 emac running ProTools an...   Tue 8 Jun 2004, 07:58
- - Jimmy Kansau   Hello! I've had problems with kernels on ...   Tue 27 Jan 2009, 18:04
- - Cdunn007   Jimmy, I wish I had an answer, I have similar prob...   Wed 28 Jan 2009, 17:16
|- - Jimmy Kansau   Chris, what a DRAG! I went through the exact ...   Wed 28 Jan 2009, 18:48
|- - BOsborne04   I have had this exact same problem. I'm runnin...   Sun 3 May 2009, 01:56
- - Jimmy Kansau   Thank you Brian for the link! How annoying is...   Sun 3 May 2009, 05:23


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Fri 4 Oct 2024, 14:38
- © MacMusic 1997-2008