MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
> Just Switched To Mac, What Sequencer Should I Use?, Cubase SX? Cubase SL? MOTU DP? Protools?
Kyle
post Mon 17 Feb 2003, 17:02
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 17-Feb 03
From: Alpharetta - US
Member No.: 12,515




Hey everybody. I just recently switched from a PC to my wonderful new PowerMac duel 1.25GHz G4. While on PC I used Cakewalk Pro Audio 9 and Sonar for all my recording/sequencing. Now that I'm on a mac, what should I look into? I seem to have noticed that the big players are Protools 6, MOTU Digital Performer, and Cubase. Any others I should look into? Thanks in advance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
hanikfashhou
post Wed 12 Mar 2003, 11:19
Post #2


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: 26-Sep 02
From: Manchester - UK
Member No.: 7,964




I have a 1.25GHz Dual Processort, I'm running Cubase SX, with OSX. I produce commercial dance tracks.

Cubase SX has been redesigned, the Audio handleing is much better than previous versions, if you want to produce dance music, then Cubase SX is the best.

lepetitmartien said Cubase is a little less pro, Im not sure which angle he is coming from, because in the dance music industry Cubase is as good as any!

Pro tools is too expensive, and personally not worth the cash, Cubase can do as much as Pro Tools as a total audio sequencer, if you want to do Audio Post for Movies then get Pro Tools. If you want to make quality dance tracks then get Cubase.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Kyle   Just Switched To Mac, What Sequencer Should I Use?   Mon 17 Feb 2003, 17:02
- - iman   Hey kyle, i'm new to this myself (recent purch...   Mon 17 Feb 2003, 23:09
- - lepetitmartien   Welcome! Now on the sequencers: If you ne...   Mon 17 Feb 2003, 23:48
- - Kyle   Sounds great! Thanks for all the suggestions. ...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 00:07
- - garysome1   lepetitmartien, I'm curious, what leads you to...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 05:40
- - stergz   One thing to note about Pro Tools 6, is that you c...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 07:05
- - rickenbacker   Ahem, LPM, I don't know if I'd call Cubase...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 11:06
- - lepetitmartien   QUOTE (Kyle @ Feb 18 2003, 00:07)but what abo...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 16:44
- - rickenbacker   QUOTE I think that if you can, you should really h...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 17:42
- - Kyle   Once again, wonderful feedback. I have now removed...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 17:50
- - lepetitmartien   You'll can still use PT free when it'll be...   Tue 18 Feb 2003, 23:47
- - anarchosyn   Kyle, it really comes down to what you feel you...   Wed 19 Feb 2003, 05:52
- - rickenbacker   Kyle: I don't know where you're based, but...   Wed 19 Feb 2003, 12:37
- - sazerac   Just thought I'd add my two cents - I started ...   Wed 19 Feb 2003, 18:07
- - liquidh2o   if you decide to go the Cubase route, I have the f...   Sat 8 Mar 2003, 13:58
- - mook noodler   Hey Kyle, Steinberg has a demo version of Cubase S...   Wed 12 Mar 2003, 05:50
- - rickenbacker   I side with hanik over SX, but I'd go further ...   Wed 12 Mar 2003, 12:59
- - lepetitmartien   hanikfashhou cubase has had midi timing problems f...   Thu 13 Mar 2003, 03:47
- - hanikfashhou   Rickenbacker, unfortunately I havent used SX for r...   Fri 14 Mar 2003, 02:36
- - horselesspaul   Kyle, Can I just add that the oft aired Logic is w...   Fri 14 Mar 2003, 09:16


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Sun 22 Dec 2024, 15:25
- © MacMusic 1997-2008