MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
> Imac 2ghz Core Duo Question
RobbieG
post Mon 14 Aug 2006, 13:35
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 13-Aug 06
From: Washington - US
Member No.: 82,296




Hi there,

Is this new imac 2GHz core duo a decent system for recording? I currently have Pro Tools LE 6.1 with the MBox (1). I'm most likely going to upgrade to the FireBox or another firewire interface and with different software in the future. The digi 002 is quite expensive for a fire wire connection. I'm sure it's sweet, but the MOTO seems like a good product and it's cheaper. I don't like how Pro Tools locks you into their gear.

Basically any thoughts on the new imac 2 GHZ core duo are welcomed and appreciated.

Thanks,
Rob

This post has been edited by RobbieG: Mon 14 Aug 2006, 13:45
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
edge100
post Wed 16 Aug 2006, 01:30
Post #2


Rookie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 20-May 04
From: Ottawa - CA
Member No.: 43,617




QUOTE (RobbieG @ Mon 14 Aug 2006, 12:35) *
Hi there,

Is this new imac 2GHz core duo a decent system for recording? I currently have Pro Tools LE 6.1 with the MBox (1). I'm most likely going to upgrade to the FireBox or another firewire interface and with different software in the future. The digi 002 is quite expensive for a fire wire connection. I'm sure it's sweet, but the MOTO seems like a good product and it's cheaper. I don't like how Pro Tools locks you into their gear.

Basically any thoughts on the new imac 2 GHZ core duo are welcomed and appreciated.

Thanks,
Rob


Well, I'm using one every day for audio production, and it keeps on blowing me away. I have the 2GB/250GB option on my 20", and I've never had CPU issues in either Logic 7.2 or Live 5.2 (which is my new DAW of choice).

Skip the 002. It is just "ok" sounding, and offers little to no flexibility in terms of DAW choice. Get yourself a Metric Halo 2882 or RME Fireface for less, and spend the extra $$$ on monitoring, acoustic treatment, or something like that, especially if you already own another DAW.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
shotsi672
post Wed 16 Aug 2006, 02:39
Post #3


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 14-Nov 05
From: - AU
Member No.: 72,500




QUOTE (edge100 @ Wed 16 Aug 2006, 00:30) *
Well, I'm using one every day for audio production, and it keeps on blowing me away. I have the 2GB/250GB option on my 20", and I've never had CPU issues in either Logic 7.2 or Live 5.2 (which is my new DAW of choice).

Skip the 002. It is just "ok" sounding, and offers little to no flexibility in terms of DAW choice. Get yourself a Metric Halo 2882 or RME Fireface for less, and spend the extra $$$ on monitoring, acoustic treatment, or something like that, especially if you already own another DAW.


I agree. Forget about Digidesign gear since they will forget about you, DIGI001. The fact that you are tied into using ONLY their gear is bad business. And they still don't get it!

Have a look at the MOTU Ultralite. I have one with an Intel iMac 2.0ghz running Logic Express and Live 5.2. It's very good and unlike my experience with Digidesign drivers i have not had one ounce of trouble.
Highly recommended.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Sat 16 Nov 2024, 20:28
- © MacMusic 1997-2008