Apple goes Intel. Why?, Apple |
|
|
|
|
Replies
|
Tue 7 Jun 2005, 08:30
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 19-Sep 04
From: Medina - US
Member No.: 51,333
|
QUOTE (abcdaniel @ Jun 7 2005, 00:05) At this point, all the clumpsyness of using Wintel seems overshadowed buy the hungryness for transitions by Apple; that hungryness makes Apple humpty dumpty. I'm sure that Apple didn't want to have to make this transition, but they were pretty much forced into a corner. I've been paying attention to both Intel and AMD's progress over the past year, and it seems that their roadmaps look really good. A lot better than the PowerPC roadmap, anyway. There's a reason why most people, including myself, use the Mac platform. It's certainly not because of the hardware, although the designs are great, they've been lacking a lot of the newer technologies found on the x86 side. PCI-e is a great example of that. Now, there should be no reason why Mac users get left behind. Another great thing about this transition is that there is a greater potential of Apple gaining more marketshare, and at the same time gain a lot of new developers. I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a surge in Mac gaming, for example. Before anyone gets all bent of shape over this transition, just remember that it's for the best, and that PowerPC can no longer benefit Mac users with its future roadmap. That's just an unfortunate fact of life.
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
news Apple goes Intel. Why? Mon 6 Jun 2005, 20:42 BobbiStyle Hi Peeps
Had a Mac since 1987. Always for Muzak..... Mon 6 Jun 2005, 20:42 vaal Everyone needs to relax, it's going to be just... Mon 6 Jun 2005, 21:07 BobbiStyle Hi Vaal
I agree about the IBM "lack", w... Mon 6 Jun 2005, 21:24 maxryzone can someone explain in clear terms what this all m... Mon 6 Jun 2005, 21:31 vaal No, absolutely nothing is wasted, it won't aff... Mon 6 Jun 2005, 22:12 Jsegura Apple cannot marry with anybody. If IBM, that by t... Mon 6 Jun 2005, 23:02 lepetitmartien I didn't put everything into the news, I tried... Mon 6 Jun 2005, 23:25 indebttome Let's remember this, as well - although OSX is... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 00:13 abcdaniel this is CRAP! Longevity, come on!
it won... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 00:15 lepetitmartien Just wrote something really stupid, it'll run ... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 00:19 abcdaniel Yeah, really, f*** it. New versions, new versions,... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 06:05 abcdaniel Isn't mr Steve known for being a bit** to work... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 10:25 coldharbour Yeah well, at the moment PPC is looking pretty goo... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 11:27 abcdaniel QUOTE As Steve said, it won't be nothing like ... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 12:35 chidders Er... Am I missing something?
When this move to I... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 12:48 coldharbour QUOTE (abcdaniel @ Jun 7 2005, 11:35)Just as ... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 13:07 vaal QUOTE (chidders @ Jun 7 2005, 06:48)Er... Am ... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 14:40 abcdaniel i've might have worked myself up a bit here...... Tue 7 Jun 2005, 18:15 lepetitmartien The big problem we face is altivec, it'll need... Wed 8 Jun 2005, 00:31 coldharbour QUOTE (lepetitmartien @ Jun 7 2005, 23:31)The... Wed 8 Jun 2005, 10:36 stratology "- No one will be able to say macs are crap b... Wed 8 Jun 2005, 17:02 lepetitmartien An interesting article on Ars Technica, not far fr... Wed 8 Jun 2005, 17:03 stratology Ars Technica was always one of the best sources I ... Wed 8 Jun 2005, 17:18 jeffca Hey, Guys!
If you read between the lines of S... Wed 8 Jun 2005, 19:15 lepetitmartien It's clear Steve decided that enough was enoug... Thu 9 Jun 2005, 03:12 lepetitmartien here is the post of a friend on Gaygeeks.org
QUOT... Thu 9 Jun 2005, 19:30 lepetitmartien And Apple posted in its news a link for the column... Fri 10 Jun 2005, 16:23 abcdaniel Oooh, then maybe OSX will go 64bit! And maybe ... Sat 11 Jun 2005, 18:53 lepetitmartien Uh, OS X is partly 64 bits, G5 are 64 bits (with a... Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:48 abcdaniel Yeah, I at least am approaching the limit where th... Sun 12 Jun 2005, 08:20 lepetitmartien The 64 bitness of an OS is at multiple levels, OS ... Mon 13 Jun 2005, 01:39
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|