Ns10s ....do They Just Look Good?, ..not enough bass....... |
|
|
|
Wed 24 Jul 2002, 01:17
|
Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0
|
the high end is very harsh (loud) and seems not too have anough bass for the little black box. ....... are these good for electronic music? ..or just for rock/jazz/pop... i know every high end studio has a pair, but maybe cause they record rock/jazz/pop, and not 4/4 beats. ...... when i finish a track and it sounds good on them... ..i play it on a stereo and there is no bottom, and just sounds different. ,,,,,, heX
|
|
|
|
2 Pages
1 2 >
|
|
Replies
(1 - 9)
|
Wed 24 Jul 2002, 15:48
|
Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758
|
First, you _can't_ sort bass from a small box, it's impossible physically. Second, they are known aspecially for their worst possible hifi speaker available looklike. Well it's not exactly that, but the common knowledge is: if it can't be ok on these, it'll be everywhere else. They don't have a balanced sound, they are harsh, tiring etc. But some engineers love them, other hate them, some even don't care The main use of a monitor pair is to give an "acurate" (mark the word) vision of what's going on. It doesn't obligatory mean that it's truth, or equal, or hifi, or whatever. Neither about Electronica, tango or poppy things. It's that the engineer knows what a mix SHOULD sound like on. quite different. Some say and prefer NS10s or a bit more delicate monitor, other want as neutral monitoring as possible. The room is to be taken into account (at least at high levels). So a monitor is not (some say that, not my opinion) linked to a type of music, but to a type of ears (the engineer model BTW and a type of brain that can interpret correctly the mix thru it to make something sensible with it. If you have them for some time, have listened a lot of (diferent) music thru it, used them for mixing, and that the result is not top notch. either you don't use your ears and brain correctly, or it's just not the monitors for you. Btw you posted in the wrong forum, bad boy (spank spank
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 25 Jul 2002, 17:47
|
Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0
|
I think youre right about the room cause when I go lay down on the bed there is a LOT more bass... ..lots of bounce in the room i guess.
......... and I use a MAC with OS9.2 and a motu2408, and ns10s.......how am I in the wrong forum?
..... heX
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 25 Jul 2002, 22:22
|
Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758
|
Hu… NS10 is a loudspeaker ? yes Ns10 is no mac hardware ? uh… no NS10 is no software ? uh neither So why this thread was in the beginning in the Mac OS 9 forum [/moderation mode] Now for your room… first remember than NS10s are nothing close to a perfect balanced quiet flat response speaker. Exactly not that. That mainly why some use them so much. Second are they rightly disposed, are you mixing at equal distance from them, right down the sweet spot? Are they close to walls, corners or other flat surfaces (mixer, table…) are they standing up, or laying flat? The room… how is it big (or small) ? The smaller, the more looking like a cube the worse it is. Did your run some audio cd from them. It helps to know HOW it should sound from it If you hear a LOT more bass on your bed, maybe there's a knob of standing waves resonating with the dimensions of the room (either adding like here or anulating each other) For proper info on the placement of loudspeakers check the genelec website http://www.genelec.com/ht/faq see the last q&a. I can't tell you to check the SOS website (except if you're a subscriber) as the article on that is in his subscriber only 6 month period. But the genelec faq wil be helpfull enough. I used their insight for monitor placement ot a friend studio (with big JBLs on stands) it improved dramatically the result which was before muddy with an oversized bass to something much more clean and equal (it was just a question of 20 cm and of angle of speakers). hope for the better (well, something better taht is
--------------------
|
|
|
|
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|