 Pismo And Tiger?, shall i upgrade? |
 Wed 15 Mar 2006, 19:13
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 01-Sep 05 From: Farsta - SE Member No.: 69,429  |
High,
I have a Pismo with 384 megs of RAM. I'm running Pather and i'm considering upgrading to Tiger. Would there be any benefit in running Tiger on a 400 mhz Pismo or would it just get bogged down? Thanks, JPW |
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 8)
 Thu 16 Mar 2006, 01:09
Post
#2
|
|
 Moderator In Chief (MIC)  Group: Editors Posts: 15,189 Joined: 23-Dec 01 From: Paris - FR Member No.: 2,758 |
It'll be faster in OS 9 anyway…
Now tiger is supposed to be more efficient than panther on old computers, but as my G3 is out of order since december and i've still repaired it, I haven't been able to test it myself  
-------------------- Our Classifeds • Nos petites annonces • Terms Of Service / Conditions d'Utilisation • Forum Rules / Règles des Forums • MacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki? BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki? |
|
|
|
|
Thu 16 Mar 2006, 09:07
Post
#3
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 11-Nov 05 From: Glasgow - UK Member No.: 72,419 |
I reckon you should move to Tiger; it'll feel faster. That's only a guess mind you - my Pismo has a G4 upgrade card and 640Mb ram, so not directly comparable, but it certainly feels snappier.
One oddity; System Profiler doesn't seem to recognise my internal soundcard? But everything works. |
|
|
|
|
Fri 17 Mar 2006, 01:38
Post
#4
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 01-Sep 05 From: Farsta - SE Member No.: 69,429 |
I agree with the comment about OS9. I have another Pismo with the exact same configuration running OS9 and it ROCKS! Panther is stable and doing fine on my "office" machine covering Internet and administrative tasks. I've looked into this Tiger/Panther question a bit and the consensus regarding G3s with less than 512 megs of RAM isn't so cut and dried. I think i'll stay with OS9 for the time being. I have considered a RAM/processor upgrade. Maybe i'll go that way.
Thanks for the responses. JPW |
|
|
|
|
Fri 17 Mar 2006, 10:47
Post
#5
|
|
|
Advanced Member  Group: Members Posts: 348 Joined: 10-Feb 06 From: Hamburg - DE Member No.: 76,633 |
Yo Zulu... If it ain't broke don't fix it! Sounds to me as if you "Know" your Computer well... Rock On!
|
|
|
|
|
Fri 17 Mar 2006, 11:24
Post
#6
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 01-Sep 05 From: Farsta - SE Member No.: 69,429 |
Yeah, Mac Daddy, it's like that. I just need to work on my ability to resist GAS. Advertising will drive you crazy. There's some amazing software coming out for the G5. I often have to stop and ask myself if my music will really 'improve' if i have the latest emulation of the Oxford EQ. The more i learn, the more i realise that it's the engineer and not the tools.
JPW |
|
|
|
|
Fri 17 Mar 2006, 11:27
Post
#7
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 05-May 05 From: London - UK Member No.: 65,271 |
I would second the statement that Tiger feels quite a bit faster on a Pismo than Panther, yet I would suggest more memory.
BUT, the Pismo is most powerful if you use OS 9.2.2 |
|
|
|
|
Sat 30 Aug 2008, 23:46
Post
#8
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 30-Aug 08 From: Reno - US Member No.: 103,204 |
QUOTE (trkkazulu @ Wed 15 Mar 2006, 11:13)  High, I have a Pismo with 384 megs of RAM. I'm running Pather and i'm considering upgrading to Tiger. Would there be any benefit in running Tiger on a 400 mhz Pismo or would it just get bogged down? Thanks, JPW  Hi,I have a pismo 400 with 320m ram and it has been running tiger 10.4.11 great. it seems to be just as fast as it did with 10.3.9 God luck |
|
|
|
|
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 07:57
Post
#9
|
|
 Rookie Group: Members Posts: 43 Joined: 29-Feb 04 From: Gradec - AT Member No.: 37,222 |
had a lombard 333 and a pismo 400. both with 512 mb RAM. both running 10.4.
-------------------- -dv-
|
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
