MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Tibook 800 Or Dual 1.25, Which to choose?
Schack
post Mon 23 Sep 2002, 22:22
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 16-Jun 02
From: Copenhagen
Member No.: 5,128




Hey Guys!

I'm about to spend 17000 Euro on a DAW, and I'm having trouble deciding what to buy. I want reliability and a rig that's gonna last me a long time.
The Tibook is cool and portability is sexy and all that, but is it powerful and stable enough for making a record at home?
Is a firewire hd capable of handling 24-32 tracks of audio? Does Logic 5 running under OS X make use of the dual processor system?

Thanks,
Schack
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
post Tue 24 Sep 2002, 00:33
Post #2





Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0




QUOTE (Schack @ Sep 23 2002, 21:22)
Hey Guys!

I'm about to spend 17000 Euro on a DAW, and I'm having trouble deciding what to buy. I want reliability and a rig that's gonna last me a long time.
The Tibook is cool and portability is sexy and all that, but is it powerful and stable enough for making a record at home?
Is a firewire hd capable of handling 24-32 tracks of audio? Does Logic 5 running under OS X make use of the dual processor system?

Thanks,
Schack

I think the tibook is going to be revamped soon so I would hesitate before purchasing . Rumors of 1Gigahertz processor and possbile DVD-R are floating around.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
damann
post Tue 24 Sep 2002, 02:19
Post #3


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044




hmurchison is right,
i have both, and the only value i place on the powerbook is the fact that i can sit comfortably on the sofa when using it/can travel lightly with it! wink.gif
the desktop machine will always outperform the laptop, raw power will always be more useful...


--------------------
one for all and all for one...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
beezkneez
post Wed 25 Sep 2002, 11:55
Post #4


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 25-Sep 02
From: Dobbs Ferry - US
Member No.: 7,930




hmurchison: you really are on all the mac music forums! which is your favorite?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synthetic
post Wed 25 Sep 2002, 20:06
Post #5


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 821
Joined: 25-Jun 01
From: Springfield - US
Member No.: 1,082




yep, i agree with the majority here... i have a 500mhz tibook and still end up using my 350mhz Yosemite G3 for most work. The tibook was primarily for live performances and traveling. I almost decided to sell my G3 and Digi001 after getting the Tibook but decided I would rather keep it because I still use it a lot.


--------------------
----------------------------------------
<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'>Synthetic Tone</span>
Click above for totally original electronic music, art, & photos.
Click below to become an active member of the MacMusic.org site..

<span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>Become An Active Member</span>

G4 550mhz Tibook & Brand Spankin New Dual G5 2Ghz Power Mac with Tiger.
So long old OS9 apps :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
post Thu 26 Sep 2002, 05:09
Post #6


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group Icon

Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758




To sit into a laptop, computer have to cut corners, unfortunately, it's the ones the most useful for power computing: cache, HD speed, max ram, display etc.

If you're main work is best suited on a desktop, go for it. then eventually you can have a laptop for travel or help.

If you're never at home and can get with it, go laptop.

Laptops simply can't outperform desktops, plain and simple. And personally I begin to hate gigs with guys fixing their laptops and balancing their bodies without anything else on stage. Get a desktop and shake that ass ! smile.gif

That said, Kraftwerk tonight in Paris was GREAT tongue.gif


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Schack
post Thu 26 Sep 2002, 09:01
Post #7


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 16-Jun 02
From: Copenhagen
Member No.: 5,128




Thanks for the advice. I've decided to go desktop. My dealer also recommended this, and the desktop setup is actually going to be 1200 Euro cheaper, nice.

It'll be the dual 1 gHz, though, I was told the that the extra .25 don't really justify the higher price.

I've never owned a DAW before, and I can hardly wait to get started biggrin.gif

LoveSchack
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rickenbacker
post Thu 26 Sep 2002, 10:29
Post #8


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 645
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Broughton
Member No.: 4,705




I've noticed a lot of people are grumbling that the new dual G4s are very noisy (ie the fan). People who bought the new duals have returned them for a dual G4 from the previous range, the Quicksilver. This fact might explain why some stockists are suddenly running out of Quicksilvers where a few weeks ago they were desparate to shift old stock.

Also, MacUser magazine (go to www.macuser.co.uk to read the review in full) reckoned the new dual 1GHz was not worth the money over the new dual 867 - the performance boost was minimal in their tests. They had not tried a 1.25, but hoped for better things from that. Maybe a dual 867 would be enough - at least then you've saved the money to cover the cost of an Apple 17" display.

Just thought this might be worth knowing, Schack. Enjoy your new DAW, whatever you buy - I'm sure you will!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Sun 28 Apr 2024, 00:42
- © MacMusic 1997-2008