440 Forums > English > Mac Music > Audio, MIDI, DSP Cards and Interfaces, Controllers > Digidesign Mbox, Mbox2, 001, 002 etc. Mbox Vs. The Rest Of The Usb World, guidance for powerbook recording set up |
 Mon 15 Dec 2003, 05:42
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 01-Dec 03 From: Virginia - US Member No.: 30,055  |
I have a g4 powerbook 867 Mhz, 384 mb RAM, running 10.2.8. After some investigation, I've narrowed my choices down to two, for money, quality and reliability: getting an M-Audio Duo and Logic Audio Big Box or getting the Digidesign M-box. (roughly $500 for either) I'm wondering if there's any major differences between the two set-ups (hardware or software advantages, etc.) and also if anyone has any recommendations or warnings for me on my set up in general.
I'll be doing some recording with a mixer probably or just using the 2 inputs for mics, etc. I recognize the limitations of USB but I need good software more than inputs/outputs right now. Maybe I'll upgrade to FireWire sometime. Thanks for your advice! |
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
|
Fri 19 Dec 2003, 12:42
Post
#2
|
|
 Maniac Member  Group: Members Posts: 645 Joined: 17-May 02 From: Broughton Member No.: 4,705 |
A popular rule of thumb is that it's better to increase the bit-depth of audio files rather than increase the sampling rate. In other words, working at 24-bit and 44.1KHz is good enough for most humans (really, only bats and high-end mastering engineers might be picky about your track's sonic definition above this) and is an acceptable compromise between sound quality and hard disk space. Plus everyone listens to the finished CD at 16-bit, 44/1KHz, anyway.
It is perfectly true, though, that the quality of your sound cannot be higher than the weakest link in your signal chain. You have a $1,000 acoustic guitar, but you record it using a $150 mic. Disappointed with the results, you will be. As for the FireWire 410, there does seem to be quite a crowd of disgruntled users out there already. The reality doesn't seem to match the expectation, basically. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
tgwj Mbox Vs. The Rest Of The Usb World Mon 15 Dec 2003, 05:42
Presto Yeah, keep it small until you find you really need... Mon 15 Dec 2003, 21:24 tgwj Thanks. yeah I've been reading up on it. I j... Thu 18 Dec 2003, 09:36 StolltheMusic I have been looking into buying an audio interface... Thu 18 Dec 2003, 12:55 Presto Decide on what you want to plug into your computer... Thu 18 Dec 2003, 21:23 Presto Ah, I forgot:
48khz is quite sufficient unless you... Thu 18 Dec 2003, 21:37 jebbels If you are recording songs with the intention of b... Mon 22 Dec 2003, 16:15 rickenbacker Yes, because the original file you capture at 24-b... Mon 22 Dec 2003, 19:38 MusicMan91 M-Audio OmniStudio USB. There really isn't an... Sat 3 Jan 2004, 19:28 macyu Hmm.. the OmniStudio USB has been something I... Sun 4 Jan 2004, 07:31 MusicMan91 I haven't experienced any noticeable lag time ... Sun 4 Jan 2004, 07:47 dextrometh I did a bit of research recently upon deciding to ... Sun 11 Jan 2004, 04:40 lushbudget I'm a new DAW user and my choice was the Mbox ... Tue 13 Jan 2004, 18:45 gahlord Hey all,
So this topic is sorta like what I need ... Tue 13 Jan 2004, 19:46 pinostut To get it working, select Reason/sampletank or abl... Tue 13 Jan 2004, 20:33 visualmusic I might as well jump on the band wagon...I'm i... Wed 14 Jan 2004, 21:04 Presto Gahlord, if I'd been able to get started with ... Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:33 dextrometh I'm just now playing with my new Mbox. I gues... Thu 15 Jan 2004, 19:21 rickenbacker From what I understand, yes, you need to have the ... Fri 16 Jan 2004, 16:39
Presto PT Free (is it still around?) used to be the only ... Fri 16 Jan 2004, 22:49 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
