 Hyperdraw Vs Track Automation, which has priority? |
 Mon 27 Mar 2006, 16:47
Post
#1
|
|
 Rookie  Group: Members Posts: 35 Joined: 17-Aug 05 From: Den Haag - NL Member No.: 68,847  |
sometimes I use hyperdraw on regions then also use track automation(yellow line on track in arrange window) on the same track. Questiion: How do the two interact and how should I handle this aspect of volume control? I use volumn automation with these methods.. have tried a fader assigned to it through midi control (yamaha promix 1), but actually prefer tweaking with these arrange window lines. I just need to sort out how they interact and if I should just use one or the other..
advice? |
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
|
Mon 27 Mar 2006, 22:30
Post
#2
|
|
 Maniac Member Group: Members Posts: 899 Joined: 12-Oct 01 From: Kirkland Member No.: 2,002 |
Hyperedit automation is region based automation, it will always be associated to a specific region, and will overide track automation.
Track based automation works best on full tracks of course. Hyper edit if you want to cut up the track, and rearrange the regions. I also noticed that moving a region with track automation, gives different results than moving a hyperedit region. 
-------------------- G-Dub
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
makaala Hyperdraw Vs Track Automation Mon 27 Mar 2006, 16:47
makaala G,
in my further science experiments with hyperdra... Tue 28 Mar 2006, 12:36
gdoubleyou You have to go in and delete the nodes, or drag an... Thu 30 Mar 2006, 01:04 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
