 Au Vs Vst |
 Mon 30 May 2005, 23:08
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 23-May 05 From: Toronto - CA Member No.: 66,025  |
As a musician new to the mac environment (used pc for years) I am unfamiliar with AU. Is this another format like VST DXI? how do they compare in terms of performance?
Thanks Mike |
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
|
Tue 13 Dec 2005, 14:04
Post
#2
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 23-Feb 03 From: Mörsil - SE Member No.: 12,939 |
QUOTE (MIDImodesitt @ Dec 13 2005, 00:46) VST is the "old-school" plugin, and they are used for both Macs and PC's so there are tons of them out there. AU's (Audio Units) use Mac OS X's native Core Audio... basically the sound produced by an AU is considerably higher quality sound. Also, since AU's are compatible with OSX's native architecture, it's a lot more CPU efficient. You can have more AU's running on a 1.5ghz G4 than VSTs on a 3ghz PC. VST and AU sound exactly the same and tax the CPU equally. I run SX3 and LogicPro6 and there's no difference. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
mikedobell Au Vs Vst Mon 30 May 2005, 23:08
coldharbour QUOTE (mikedobell @ May 30 2005, 22:08)As a m... Tue 31 May 2005, 10:08 mikedobell thanks! Tue 31 May 2005, 14:46 celsius QUOTE (coldharbour @ May 31 2005, 09:08)It is... Thu 30 Jun 2005, 19:03 azusa QUOTE (celsius)In what way is AU considered superi... Thu 30 Jun 2005, 21:15 MIDImodesitt VST is the "old-school" plugin, and they... Tue 13 Dec 2005, 01:46 sberkley Correction: the sound quality of an AU is not supe... Tue 13 Dec 2005, 03:36 Metro SE QUOTE (MIDImodesitt @ Dec 13 2005, 00:46)VST ... Tue 13 Dec 2005, 21:18 MIDImodesitt ok, I'm a noob and I stand corrected Tue 13 Dec 2005, 23:21
UP Multimedia Noob... I did not know this word I looked it up on... Wed 14 Dec 2005, 11:31 |
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
