Wed 21 Aug 2002, 11:25
Post
#1
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 15-Aug 02 From: DUBLIN - IE Member No.: 6,879 |
I've been a pretty happy Protools user for several years now.
Been putting off buying a new 'native' system 'til the whole OSX audio thing settles down. I think Protools TDM latency is about 1-3 ms on monitoring a record enabled input. I've heard that OSX with audio units is promising the same if not better performance running 'native' Apps?! Ideal scenario: Logic 5 OSX running @ 96k, with true dual processor support. Anyone any ideas if l Emagic plan to release a new Pro 96k Sound Card with multiple outputs? Am I expecting too much? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Replies
Tue 3 Sep 2002, 19:32
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 393 Joined: 11-Jun 02 From: London - UK Member No.: 5,044 |
well, emagic have just stiffed us all anyway.
logic for x, but no digi support, no vst/asio support etc, etc... thanks a bundle guys! don't dump that protools rig yet jackc! -------------------- one for all and all for one...
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
JackC Latency In Osx Wed 21 Aug 2002, 11:25
hmurchison Read this
http://gigue.peabody.jhu.edu/~mdboom/l... Wed 21 Aug 2002, 16:43
damann sounds pretty reasonable to me!
logic does of ... Mon 26 Aug 2002, 18:28
Yukulele No, Damann, DP with MOTU is a good solution :-)
Ju... Tue 27 Aug 2002, 02:50
formatj Why the angry face? Emagic hasn't stiffed anyo... Wed 4 Sep 2002, 06:03
damann i know all of this, the future looks great.
my ... Wed 4 Sep 2002, 09:48
formatj I understand your frustration.
OS X is a great op... Wed 4 Sep 2002, 11:11
damann we're in the same boat bro'
my setup is... Wed 4 Sep 2002, 14:30
kamilof I've installed OS X 10.2 over a OS X 10.1.5 (w... Wed 4 Sep 2002, 16:21
hmurchison We'll still be waiting a bit.
To be fair
A... Wed 4 Sep 2002, 18:19![]() ![]() |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:










