![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 83 Joined: 04-Jul 03 From: Porto - PT Member No.: 20,713 ![]() |
Has anyone tried Tiger on a slow machine? I have a TiBook 550 with 1GB ram and am considering an upgrade. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks!
-------------------- |
|
|
![]() |
Replies
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Moderator ![]() Group: Team Posts: 370 Joined: 19-Mar 03 From: Umeå - SE Member No.: 14,645 ![]() |
Generally speaking mac OS-X has actually gotten real speed bumps along the major
releases. (perhaps not always dramatic speed increases - but still...) Tiger is no exception to this rule. Reports from various users on the Unicornation BBS seem to indicate that Tiger is indeed a bit snappier than Panther. Also check out this article from Ars techica: http://arstechnica.com/reviews/os/macosx-10.4.ars The article is long ![]() ![]() The article can downloaded as pdf-file and perused at your leisure. Cheers: Dixiechicken -------------------- ==================
Oh my god it's full of stars… --------------------------------------------------- Mac-G5-2x.2.0, OS-X 10.5.1, 250/200Gb HD - 7.0Gb ram DP-5.13, Motu 828 MK-II, MTP AV Usb, ltst drvs, Kurzweil-2000, EPS-16, Proteus-2000, Yamaha 01V Emes Kobalt monitors ================================ |
|
|
Posts in this topic





























![]() ![]() |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
