Fri 14 Jan 2005, 06:01
Post
#1
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: 13-Jan 05 From: Melbourne - AU Member No.: 58,389 |
G5 Xserve was recently released ...
http://www.apple.com/xserve/ 1U, 19in rack mount unit, with multi-platform compatibility (mac / win / unix) with a lot of power. Bascially, a very attractive proposition, especially for hi-rez recording and DVD post. From reports the unit is selling very well. (Sure, its price and features are aimed at medium to large enterprise.) http://www.macworld.com/news/2005/01/04/xs...serve/index.php For the realists: if you had one of these in yor studio, how would you - given your particular config. and work processes - make use of it? I'm very curious about how people would take advatange of its features. http://www.apple.com/xserve/specs.html For the dreamers: ...do you visualize something that is a like half-step between the Mac Mini and Xserve, an upgradable 1U media server / external processor hub that keeps older model G4s in action (i.e. rather than buying a whole new computer to get the power) and is mobile and robust enough for "out of house" production projects...? What are your thoughts? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Replies
Sun 16 Jan 2005, 18:41
Post
#2
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 127 Joined: 22-Aug 03 From: Greenwood - US Member No.: 23,402 |
Distributed processing works well for the scientific community because there's no need to observe the results in real time.
Distributed processing in the recording studio is a different monster because of our need to listen in real time. The big bottleneck being the ethernet connection. So nowadays we're mostly using 100 Megabits per second. Most of you probably know that on an ethernet, all computer have simultaneous access to the network. That means that the more computers you have on the network, the more "chatter" is going to occur. Ethernets typically are pretty stable up to about 25% of its capacity. Above that; the collisions in data packets start creating errors and drops in data. Collisions and errors result in audio problems and latency. I am very interested in seeing a review that publishes real numbers on performance and latency of the node technology. Scott |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Tree Leopard G5 Xserve - Good Audio Potential? Fri 14 Jan 2005, 06:01
lepetitmartien Well the Xserve is around for some time now, it... Sat 15 Jan 2005, 04:25
Tree Leopard I've been thinking about your "node... Sun 16 Jan 2005, 04:34
jeffca While a G5 Xserve Cluster Node would kick ass as a... Sun 16 Jan 2005, 16:58
soif I agree with swilder, distributed processing is no... Tue 18 Jan 2005, 10:29
beyaRecords As for the latency issue regarding node work the u... Tue 18 Jan 2005, 12:43
Tree Leopard OK.... thus far, some of the ideas we have are...
... Tue 18 Jan 2005, 14:44
beyaRecords Question,
doesn't Nuendo 3 support this Node t... Tue 18 Jan 2005, 16:13
lepetitmartien To be more precise, "my" node is based o... Tue 18 Jan 2005, 16:15
Tree Leopard The Great Realtime Networking Challenge...
As for... Sun 23 Jan 2005, 06:57
lepetitmartien No, I was talking about Mathematica, as Photoshop,... Sun 23 Jan 2005, 07:14
Tree Leopard ...I've just looked at what Mathematica actual... Sun 23 Jan 2005, 07:58
philippmaier Hi.
Just joined this forum.
I recently got a new ... Thu 9 Jun 2005, 16:18
TBRENN2000 I have used the logic node function, and set up an... Tue 27 Mar 2007, 18:37![]() ![]() |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:









