|
|
Reason 3.0 : March 10 !, Virtual Instrument |
|
|
|
Sun 20 Feb 2005, 00:44
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 20-Sep 03
From: Outer Space - CR
Member No.: 25,100
|
Reason 1 and 2 had no B*lls, sorry i had to share that with people,
its only becuase i feel that flashy presintations are better then the products, especialy when the pros who have creativly put time into working with reason and in the end, had to use another sequencer and audio hardware like pro tools and logic to get results that sound justifiable.
Rex files sound crappy and so does a old mackie 1202r.
I realy want to hear reason sound better, cuase it is easy to pick up. i composed 20 songs and fast like i used to with studio vision pro, but in the end, i was better off finishing the tracks in logic to mix them.
And i have heard decent stuff from reason, i mean creatively, but not decent enough to finish a track from start to finish that sounds atleast nearly as good as live., even live as in analogue.
but for electronic music it was great, only the little knobs need hardware to control and that is a pain as well since you need to set all that up.
hope i dont offend anyone who lives for reason, im a live-player as well and i say that from my experience.
This post has been edited by Jibril: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 00:52
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|