Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Edirol Ua-20 Vs M-audio Audiophile 24/96 For Osx
440 Forums > English > Mac Music > Audio, MIDI, DSP Cards and Interfaces, Controllers > Edirol
chris72
hi,

I am tossing up between buying either a edirol ua-20 vs m-audio audiophile 24/96 for OSX,as a busget recording solution, i only want to record guitar tracks one at a time from an amp modeller (v-amp2) and was wondering if anyone had a suggestion as which way to go? I am using reason & recycle but will need to use some sort of OSX software to record into. The m-audio thing comes bundled with a basic verson of reason, is this a good thing? Are Edirols osx drivers capable of recording to 24 bit? Can the eridol record at 96 like the m-audio.

Both units are the same price in Australia and i am not sure which way to go, any help would be greatly appreciated

cheers chris
alcolo
Hi!

Please see below some info about the UA-20:

"EDIROL
UA-20

EDIROL UA-20 USB audio interface, signal processing in24Bit/ 44.1 + 48kHz and 48 kHz, line and guitar/microphoneinput, headphone output, MIDI In/Out, incl. ASIO +WDM-Drivers, PC and Mac "


bye,

John
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.