 Apple goes Intel. Why?, Apple |
|
|
|
 |
Réponse(s)
|
|
  lun. 6 juin 2005, 23:25
|
Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Groupe : Editors
Messages : 15,189
Inscrit : 23 déc. 01
Lieu : Paris - FR
Membre no 2,758
|
I didn't put everything into the news, I tried to concentrate on the main with some depth and personal ARRRGGGGh  The fat code will run on PPC and Intel and Apple will support PPC still after the 2006 date. On the software side, it's a rather safe path if everything is as Steve said (easiness to recompile), on the hardware I much more in doubt, it'll restrain people to buy new hardware. It's really sad as IBM has some really fine CPUs in the Power family (G5 is a Power4 lite). The 2 important things… - nowhere it is said it'll run on x86 CPUs… - nowhere it is said it'll be "PCs" But we lack most of the important informations in fact to really know what's happening save the input needed for developers and end users, the real deal on the architecture is unknown yet. 
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
 news Apple goes Intel. Why? lun. 6 juin 2005, 20:42 BobbiStyle Hi Peeps
Had a Mac since 1987. Always for Muzak..... lun. 6 juin 2005, 20:42 vaal Everyone needs to relax, it's going to be just... lun. 6 juin 2005, 21:07 BobbiStyle Hi Vaal
I agree about the IBM "lack", w... lun. 6 juin 2005, 21:24 maxryzone can someone explain in clear terms what this all m... lun. 6 juin 2005, 21:31 vaal No, absolutely nothing is wasted, it won't aff... lun. 6 juin 2005, 22:12 Jsegura Apple cannot marry with anybody. If IBM, that by t... lun. 6 juin 2005, 23:02 indebttome Let's remember this, as well - although OSX is... mar. 7 juin 2005, 00:13 abcdaniel this is CRAP! Longevity, come on!
it won... mar. 7 juin 2005, 00:15 lepetitmartien Just wrote something really stupid, it'll run ... mar. 7 juin 2005, 00:19 abcdaniel Yeah, really, f*** it. New versions, new versions,... mar. 7 juin 2005, 06:05 vaal QUOTE (abcdaniel @ Jun 7 2005, 00:05)At this ... mar. 7 juin 2005, 08:30 abcdaniel Isn't mr Steve known for being a bit** to work... mar. 7 juin 2005, 10:25 coldharbour Yeah well, at the moment PPC is looking pretty goo... mar. 7 juin 2005, 11:27 abcdaniel QUOTE As Steve said, it won't be nothing like ... mar. 7 juin 2005, 12:35 chidders Er... Am I missing something?
When this move to I... mar. 7 juin 2005, 12:48 coldharbour QUOTE (abcdaniel @ Jun 7 2005, 11:35)Just as ... mar. 7 juin 2005, 13:07 vaal QUOTE (chidders @ Jun 7 2005, 06:48)Er... Am ... mar. 7 juin 2005, 14:40 abcdaniel i've might have worked myself up a bit here...... mar. 7 juin 2005, 18:15 lepetitmartien The big problem we face is altivec, it'll need... mer. 8 juin 2005, 00:31 coldharbour QUOTE (lepetitmartien @ Jun 7 2005, 23:31)The... mer. 8 juin 2005, 10:36 stratology "- No one will be able to say macs are crap b... mer. 8 juin 2005, 17:02 lepetitmartien An interesting article on Ars Technica, not far fr... mer. 8 juin 2005, 17:03 stratology Ars Technica was always one of the best sources I ... mer. 8 juin 2005, 17:18 jeffca Hey, Guys!
If you read between the lines of S... mer. 8 juin 2005, 19:15 lepetitmartien It's clear Steve decided that enough was enoug... jeu. 9 juin 2005, 03:12 lepetitmartien here is the post of a friend on Gaygeeks.org
QUOT... jeu. 9 juin 2005, 19:30 lepetitmartien And Apple posted in its news a link for the column... ven. 10 juin 2005, 16:23 abcdaniel Oooh, then maybe OSX will go 64bit! And maybe ... sam. 11 juin 2005, 18:53 lepetitmartien Uh, OS X is partly 64 bits, G5 are 64 bits (with a... dim. 12 juin 2005, 03:48 abcdaniel Yeah, I at least am approaching the limit where th... dim. 12 juin 2005, 08:20 lepetitmartien The 64 bitness of an OS is at multiple levels, OS ... lun. 13 juin 2005, 01:39
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|
|
