MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Sampletank 2 Xl Performance..., Processor overload
NeoAle73
posté sam. 7 févr. 2004, 16:36
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 4
Inscrit : 18 janv. 04
Lieu : Pertengo - IT
Membre no 33,477




I'm using SampleTank 2 XL RTAS on a ProTools LE 6.1.2, PowerMac G4 dual processor 1.25GHZ, 768MB RAM. OSX 10.2.latest. My problem is that when I have just about 8 to 10 midi track that run into ST2XL and just one audio track (no other plug-ins), the processors overload, even if the playback engine has a 1024 samples buffer (the largest available in ProTools). Is this normal or not? Do you think that buying some more RAM should help my system achieve a better performance? Or do I have to go G5...(which is not in my plans for now) Thanks a lot for any enlightment!

NeoAle73
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Metro SE
posté sam. 7 févr. 2004, 22:52
Message #2


Member
**

Groupe : Members
Messages : 70
Inscrit : 01 juil. 03
Lieu : Framingham - US
Membre no 20,523




The problem is most likely that Sampletank 2 has separate effects on all different channels. These eats up a lot of processing. I do not know pro-tools but you should be able to route all channels that have reverb on them to a separate output and then put a different reverb plug-in on that output and then turn off all of the reverbs in ST2 on separate channels. This will give you a very big performance boost.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NeoAle73
posté dim. 8 févr. 2004, 10:16
Message #3


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 4
Inscrit : 18 janv. 04
Lieu : Pertengo - IT
Membre no 33,477




Hi! Thanks for your very quick reply. I'try your suggestion and let you know the results. Have a nice day smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NeoAle73
posté mer. 11 févr. 2004, 15:57
Message #4


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 4
Inscrit : 18 janv. 04
Lieu : Pertengo - IT
Membre no 33,477




Your suggestion was very good, Metro SE, actually I almost halved the processor load. Thanx a lot smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - vendredi 10 mai 2024, 00:50
- © MacMusic 1997-2008