|
  |
 Apple introduces 20-inch iMac, Apple |
|
|
|
|
 Wed 19 Nov 2003, 04:09
|
Member
Group: Active Members
Posts: 92
Joined: 30-Sep 02
From: New York - US
Member No.: 8,113
|
I think there's a significant consumer market for people who want large screens but don't need to use high-end pro apps. Someone who wants to surf the web, play an occasional game, edit their photo library, listen to iTunes, all on a big screen, but wants the all-in-one design for their home. Those folks don't need a dual-G5 (well, YET, anyway).
There are a lot of people happy with their G3 iMacs, too, of course, but some are bound to like the aesthetics of this all-in-one form factor plus the huge screen but don't care about processor speed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 05:35
|
Junior Member
Group: Members
Posts: 132
Joined: 13-Sep 03
From: - US
Member No.: 24,676
|
hi peter-
while all the things you say are true, really my whole point is sort of missing you. i'm not saying nobody will appreciate the package, i'm just saying it's lame in principle to have a $2200 web surfing desktop system. it's the pricepoint for that feature set that i'm calling into question as well as the spirit of putting something like this together.
the analogy i'd make would be to the two wheel drive SUVs. you get your big-ass tough-looking gas-tax-loophole idiotmobile but you couldn't actually go offroad on it or tow anything or even drive in the snow. soooo what makes it different than a staionwagon again? oh right... _status!
i'd hate to even get into a discussion of what kinds of other computers you can get for $2200. your last sentence about how folks will appreciate the design despite the performance shortcomings exactly hits on the head my whole problem with apple that this 20" iMac typifies: it's a boobjob of a computer. like a tv commercial or a sitcom, the idea is the same "it won't matter that it's dippy and pointless if we can score enough clevage points".
it's hw releases like this that make me embarrassed to be a mac person. have you seen the porche commercial where the uppermiddle class guy is just gunning his cayenne in the driveway so his friend can hear how cool it sounds over the phone? that's apple all the way. consumer market, sure- but markets can be pretty gross sometimes. like walking past a bang&olufson store in the mall.
--------------------
Kit: Dual Ghz G4, Vaio 2.6ghz GRV670 notebook. Software: Reaktor, Reason, Ableton Live. Leanings: Laptop performance, jazz guitar, singing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 19 Nov 2003, 17:00
|
Member
Group: Active Members
Posts: 92
Joined: 30-Sep 02
From: New York - US
Member No.: 8,113
|
Jeez, boze, I understand the desire for a faster processor in these iMacs, but boobjob? Give me a break. I'm running a 1GHz G4 in my PowerBook. They're energy-efficient processors that generate very little heat and thus don't require a fan. And they run a LOT of software (including some pretty powerful stuff) very, very well. And I'm sure if Apple could affordably add G5s to its iMacs and ensure proper production, they would -- but I'd rather see those scarcer chips go into the systems where they're needed, in the kind of hardware they'll work in (i.e., the G5 form factor with its fans).
There's no need to trash the market for this particular computer. When it makes economic sense and production sense for Apple to add a G5 to the iMac, they will. Don't be ashamed of being a Mac user. I'd wonder instead about consumers buying PCs based on MHz and then discovering they're not as intuitive and elegant as the Mac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
