  |
 Witch Is The Best Software, Sequencer. recording software |
 Fri 16 May 2003, 10:25
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 14-May 03 From: HOLLAND - NL Member No.: 17,890  |
Hi Guys,
An other question from me. Recently I posted a question about witch system to choose, …. Mac or PC. I’m still attracted to the MAC and I’m trying to get clear witch configuration would be best for me. So please share experience with me. 1. Witch is the best sequencer on the MAC, Cubase or Logic? 2. Witch is the best audio editor/recording software for the MAC ( Like wavelab for PC) Thanks in advance, Alex |
 |
 
|
|
Fri 16 May 2003, 10:44
Post
#2
|
|
 Advanced Member  Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-Oct 01 From: Chandler - US Member No.: 2,003 |
Metro 6...Audio and midi sequencer.
-------------------- kaboombahchuck
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Sat 17 May 2003, 07:50
Post
#3
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 300 Joined: 21-Aug 02 Member No.: 7,031 |
kaboombahchuck you are so bad.
 ------------------------------------------ sampoo , I think you can't get any clear answers because it depends on how individual feels comfortable which each software. For me I use : 1. Sequencer - Digital Performer 2. Audio editor/recording software - Peak I'm happy with both. |
|
|
|
|
Sat 17 May 2003, 15:44
Post
#4
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 14-May 03 From: Troy - US Member No.: 17,894 |
Hi Guys,
An other question from me. Recently I posted a question about witch system to choose, ?. Mac or PC. I?m still attracted to the MAC and I?m trying to get clear witch configuration would be best for me. So please share experience with me. 1. Witch is the best sequencer on the MAC, Cubase or Logic? 2. Witch is the best audio editor/recording software for the MAC ( Like wavelab for PC) Thanks in advance, Alex Motus' Digital Performer 4 is great for seuqencing midi, www.motu.com Peak is great for editing audio files.. Peak has fully fucntional demos available.. www.bias-inc.com -------------------- Saurabh Sethi
|
|
|
|
|
Sun 18 May 2003, 03:35
Post
#5
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-Oct 01 From: Chandler - US Member No.: 2,003 |
I'm wondering why folks want to use different programs, when 1 will do the trick. Check out metro 6 I think you will find it meets or exceeds all expetations.
This post has been edited by kaboombahchuck: Sun 18 May 2003, 03:38 -------------------- kaboombahchuck
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Sun 18 May 2003, 17:58
Post
#6
|
|
 Maniac Member Group: Members Posts: 821 Joined: 25-Jun 01 From: Springfield - US Member No.: 1,082 |
kaboom... its like stereo systems to me. The stereo's that have it all built-in together usually use cheaper componets and aren't as good as the buying seperate pieces from different companies as each sometimes makes one part better than the other. This is how I feel metaphorically about most software. I have never seen ANY software that did it all better than seperate apps. There is almost always something that one app does better than another.
Nothing personal but I am just not a fan of Cubase. I tried it once and after working with ProTools and Logic... it just didn't feel comfortable to me. It wasn't the latest version though. But as stated before... everyone is going to have their personal favorites. My happens to be PT for audio sequencing, Logic for midi sequncing and yep... I use Peak for 2 track editing sometimes.
-------------------- ----------------------------------------
<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'>Synthetic Tone</span> Click above for totally original electronic music, art, & photos. Click below to become an active member of the MacMusic.org site.. <span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>Become An Active Member</span> G4 550mhz Tibook & Brand Spankin New Dual G5 2Ghz Power Mac with Tiger. So long old OS9 apps :( |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
