Making Music, how do YOU do it? |
|
|
|
Fri 25 Apr 2003, 20:49
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 24-Apr 03
From: Ft. Lauderdale - US
Member No.: 16,703
|
Since nobody wants to tell you their secrets, I will "give away" how I currently work, since it is about to radically change thanks to my switching to mac. I select a drum kit by picking through my sample archive and/or cutting up bits of an old old song, circa 70s usually. I transfer the wav files to a zip, pop the zip into my mpc2KXL and load them onto its 16 pads. I then pound out a beat, starting with the kick and snare usually -- though I have found starting with another soundset can be very stimulating - like a conga or timbale, even 808/909 toms (very danny tenaglia). Each layer of the beat is done on a seperate track. I record parts that need to interlock well normally, and when I need a change up I SOLO the new track. Then I preview all parts as I go, redoing new bits that dont fit well. Taste is 98% of composition imho. I follow in with either a bass line or the first synth part. It helps to be in a constant state of sound design, but carefully - instruments like my Nord can easily have overwrites since it has no Naming feature just a number. On the Virus I usually combine the function of the sound with the tracks working title, like padRighteous, if the tracks name was Righteous. Backing up, sound design and keeping a song log - three very important things to do. I also intend to get a digital camera for snapping pics of my analog mixer and then printing them out and sealing them in plastic for setting up the mixer at shows. How else can you start? Maybe with a beer or a bowl. Scotty
|
|
|
|
|
Mon 5 May 2003, 20:06
|
Maniac Member
Group: Members
Posts: 799
Joined: 24-Mar 02
From: Entre-Deux-Mers - FR
Member No.: 3,984
|
Sorry folks this is long.
I only bother with audio (don't record midi). I use two c.500$ mics through an Mbox (phantom power + preamp + audio/digital conversion), into a simple ibook600.
I can record live stereo for groups during the day (barn loft in the country). This gives a much better sound than mixing lots of tracks using lots of mics. Its their stage amps that provide the balance. OK you get mistakes but they can rerecord and the sound is live and real stereo. Live recordings in simple stereo don't often need data-losing calculations, so I now record using 16bits only.
At night (no unwanted sound from outside) I can record me and my bits of compos. I just record bits and stick the audio files together in protools on OS9. I use nearly no plugins, and just convert from 44.1/24bits to 44.1/16bits at the bounce. For what I want to produce its usually better to produce two completely different mono tracks, one panned left and one right. So I record mainly multi-mono as just about everybody does. With multi-mono and pottering with bits here and there, you get quite nice sound technically but the musical result is rather dead, which is also the case for just about everything you hear on the radio.
>How did you start out?
I bought an imic and used a Sure stage mic in my ibook. The result was dreadful.
I then found macmusic.org and got loads of very good and enthusiastic help which decided me on my present equipment. I did realise after a while that most people on here give advice from either a professional sound engineering point of view or from the amateur and midi point of view. However, what I really needed was advice from composers recording their own stuff using audio and not much midi. The priorities are different.
I have a feeling that nowadays most composers using computers use mainly midi and have no idea what real stereo audio recordings sound like. I hope to find others in my position but I think I must be marginal.
Oh, I started composing yonks ago - guitar/voice - but I don't know how.
>What effects has it had on your life and way of thinking?
My present project has caused an almost total drain on financial reserves (I gave up most other work to concentrate on it) + the chance to raise my younger children in a more fun musical environement. Don't think its changed my way of thinking about life in general.
>How have you progressed and where you would like to see yourself in the future?
I found that only composing and recording my own "inventions" caused my imagination to gradually fade out. I found I needed to record other musicians, and myself doing other people's songs faithfully and then with my variations, also discovering loads of other peoples stuff on CDs. I don't get much help from most radio stations as they are not interested in much else than run-of-the-mill multi-mono recordings and are in a style rut - boring!! (I'm in France. Exception: FIP). I also need to perform with other musicians if I want to keep feeding my composing enthusiasm.
In the future, I should like to find my teaching CDs pirated alot (sign of success) - er well, not too much as I'd like to make my living from it. I do have hope as my market is huge and there is no real competition. I'm months and months behind partly due to the input drought I stupidly imposed on myself.
I must add that I'm now quite certain that the sound engineering (the desire for technically perfect recordings) and radio (monotonous high volume and no "risk" music), and midi (unnaturally perfect rythmn etc - not live) approach to music seems to dampen out all the wonderful variations that musicians can produce. They push composers and musicians into a rut of flattened-out music. Give me a scratchy, dirty, recording of a great live performance with all its imperfections and bits of genius anyday.
Thanks for asking - its good to look at where you've been and where you're at from time to time.
This post has been edited by Presto: Mon 5 May 2003, 20:58
--------------------
Without shit, we wouldn't be here ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Sat 10 May 2003, 05:15
|
Rookie
Group: Members
Posts: 34
Joined: 06-Apr 03
From: Melbourne - AU
Member No.: 15,653
|
Great reply Manexmachina. I sometimes find it harder to inspire myself than it is to calibrate my studio. Although the studio always takes the bulk of my time. Sometimes I will be so reved up that I could produce a full 6min track in about 2 and a half hours. It can be the greatest feeling on earth (besides the obvious). Can some more people please describe their own setups/methods?
|
|
|
|
|
Sun 16 Dec 2007, 06:28
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 348
Joined: 10-Feb 06
From: Hamburg - DE
Member No.: 76,633
|
better
{I dont think i am ever going to start up with the technical part of the music it is so much confusing for me. and i was thinking that music creation is easy. I am such a stupid}
Dear better,
It becomes a balancing act at first, only because it's "New". If you are using a Desktop it is a bit more complicated than a Laptop. Great music can be created on Laptops, not just MIDI, with good Interfaces, microphones and Pre-Amp it can and is being done... Hang out at retail stores and ask questions...
If you are setting-up a Home Studio and are not Technical, which most of us were "Not", we improve... But, remember it is about making and playing MUSIC. Pay someone to Install/Connect. Make Diagrams, use Color Tape on the Jacks... Blue goes into Blue, Yellow into.... After you pay you will also pay attention...
Personally I have a love hate thing with Engineering/Recording/Mixin'/Fixin'/Tryin'/Cryin'/Dyin'... I'm no longer Performing... I'm "Clicking" "Pasting" "Draging" Etc. Have I improved? Sure there has been progress over years of tears and fears to one day hear cheers.... My music may not be so great but I can "Double Click" faster than anyone!!!
It takes time... you can always forget about all the Tech Stuff and just play Acoustic Guitar or Piano/ Um, do you play?
With a name like "Better"... Chillax... Soon you'll be zooming...
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 9 Jan 2008, 12:48
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 09-Jan 08
From: Seattle - US
Member No.: 97,899
|
Live with a prolific musician your bound to pick stuff up. :-P
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|