MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Digi001 & Quicksilver G4 Installation, DigiSystem INIT - Hang!!
Levon River
post Fri 15 Nov 2002, 00:56
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 296
Joined: 10-Aug 02
From: Rimghobb - UA
Member No.: 6,734




QUOTE (Presto @ Nov 14 2002, 18:11)
Perhaps we should warn all digi users (that includes me) to avoid the MM forums in English.

Humbly, respectfully, and graciously requesting the august establishment of a dedicated DigiDesign (see, I'm being nice) forum which we un-Digi-washed could slink around and avoid.

Then the Digi-tized could have peace, quiet, and fellowship in which to worship, and we, the unannointed, could prowl here in the back-alleys yapping about non-proprietary systems widout causing undue anguish and gnashing of teeth to Their Majesties.

I think this would be a fine idea, a peachy idea, an idea whose time has come. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
droltam
post Fri 15 Nov 2002, 06:11
Post #12


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 15-Nov 02
From: Sydney - AU
Member No.: 9,282




Is this a dual 867? if it is ring Apple as its a Motherboard issue. NO FAULT OF DIGI. Apple will replace it with a new board.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
damann
post Sat 16 Nov 2002, 01:13
Post #13


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044




QUOTE (Levon River @ Nov 14 2002, 23:56)
Humbly, respectfully, and graciously requesting the august establishment of a dedicated DigiDesign (see, I'm being nice) forum which we un-Digi-washed could slink around and avoid.

what an excellent idea! wink.gif
dedicated forums for digi, emagic, steinberg, and motu, would help a great deal!
as i'm sure you're aware presto, the numbers of ex digi users are high in the en forums.
we're not unpleasant people, just keen to benefit others with our knowledge. unsure.gif
i tend to skip posts dedicated to digi problems, but can't help laughing at some of the anti digi posts and ultimately adding my voice.
you have to understand that we've all paid digi vast sums of money, bought into the concept, just to be treated as their bitches! angry.gif
sorry webmaster, it's you that does the hard work around here, but i do feel that seperating the main sequencers into seperate forums can be valuable to all.
i'll get my coat then...


--------------------
one for all and all for one...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Teiwaz
post Sat 16 Nov 2002, 04:06
Post #14


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 103
Joined: 30-Oct 02
From: Los Angeles - US
Member No.: 8,882




Sorry Presto. I couldn't help much with the 001, because I've never owned one. but I did spend $$$ on their TDM package; yup, I was one of their bitches for a while...

It's a weight to power ratio kind of a thing...too heavy, too expensive and not enough guts to oversee a 'serious' mix...

unsure.gif

it's all about LINKS...

http://www.uaudio.com/PPI/home.html

Check out the "Pro Tools clarification" on this page...

end of fact filled statement...

hang on damann while i grab my hat and scarf?

wink.gif


--------------------
Nobody can take from you what you give freely.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Fri 29 Nov 2024, 13:01
- © MacMusic 1997-2008