  |
 Gigastudio Vs Mach 5 |
 Mon 8 Jan 2007, 12:59
Post
#1
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: 29-Dec 06 From: PARIS - FR Member No.: 86,729  |
Hello you film scorers,
I need to expand into more GigaStudio units, to faster produce film scores, and I am seriously considering Mach 5 as an alternative, since I love OSX and am a Mac user since 87, and I still don't make it with all this PC Windows XP approach… Has anyone done some comparison with both applications yet ? Thanks a lot for sharing it. liberty |
 |
 
|
|
Tue 9 Jan 2007, 15:04
Post
#2
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 09-Jan 07 From: Pembroke Pines - US Member No.: 87,133 |
QUOTE (Liberty @ Mon 8 Jan 2007, 06:59)  Hello you film scorers, I need to expand into more GigaStudio units, to faster produce film scores, and I am seriously considering Mach 5 as an alternative, since I love OSX and am a Mac user since 87, and I still don't make it with all this PC Windows XP approach… Has anyone done some comparison with both applications yet ? Thanks a lot for sharing it. liberty I have Mach 5 which is quite good. But if you're running large sessions, will probably have challenge of using multiple Macs. May I suggest that you check out the Receptor from Muse Research. It's a dedicated VST synth in a hardware box. They're currently selling multiple units designed for film composers. Apparently they're developing a way to run the new Giga software on these units as well. For more info, call the company itself. They're very willing to take time to talk to you. |
|
|
|
|
Tue 9 Jan 2007, 19:34
Post
#3
|
|
 Maniac Member  Group: Members Posts: 899 Joined: 12-Oct 01 From: Kirkland Member No.: 2,002 |
Be aware that Tascam will be releasing a Mac version of the Giga VI pluggin, later this year.
-------------------- G-Dub
|
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
