MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest

Cargoplex

Profile
Personal Photo
Avatar
Members

Newbie
Rating
 
Options
Options
Pro Infos

Technicians / Sound Engineers - Music

Personal Info
Gender Not Set
Birthday Unknown
Baltimore
United States
Cargoplex doesn't have a personal statement currently.
Statistics
Joined: 04-Sep 03
Profile Views: 272*
Last Seen: Thu 2 Jun 2022, 01:57
Local Time: Mon 23 Dec 2024, 17:02
6 posts (0 per day)
Contact Information
AIM No Information
Yahoo No Information
ICQ No Information
MSN No Information
* Profile views updated each hour
Topics
Posts
Blog
Comments
Friends
My Content
31 Mar 2004
At my job, I deal with very large WAVE files (around 1.5gig) recorded at 24/96.

The client gets data CDs with the 24/96 files on them, and also audio CDs of each file. We use PCs in our sound lab, but I recently aquired two Macs from our graphics department. On the PCs, we use Wavelab's batch processor to convert the 24/96 files to 16/44.1. This usual averages about 3 minutes file.

So today, I set up a batch process in Peak to convert the 24/96 files to 16/44.1, and to my amazement/disappointment, it was taking up to 40 MINUTES a file! That is practically real time! The PCs we use are standard Pentium 4's with about a gig or ram. The Mac I use is a 733MHz G4 PowerMac with 1.25 gigs of ram.

I just don't know what else to say. In addition to this devastating revalation, I have also found Peak and the dicontinued Spark to be less than comparable to the power of Sound Forge or Wavelab.

I won't be giving up my Macs anytime soon, but if anyone has any insight on the these issues, please bring your two cents to this post. Thanks.
Last Visitors
Cargoplex has no visitors to display.

Comments
Other users have left no comments for Cargoplex.

Friends
There are no friends to display.
Lo-Fi Version - Mon 23 Dec 2024, 18:02
- © MacMusic 1997-2008