MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Audiounits, the beginning of the end!
damann
post Fri 12 Jul 2002, 03:00
Post #1


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044




I love X so much these days, 9.2 already seems ancient. tongue.gif
CoreAudio and CoreMidi seem to have genuinely provided an
inspiring future for developers, Emagic, Steinberg, in fact, apparently
every developer on our wish list! laugh.gif
I've heard recently that CoreAudio has a native plugin framework that
seiously out-runs ASIO or any of the 3rd party stuff by Digi, Motu etc. wink.gif
AudioUnits: a direct replacement, with 1ms latency reported, already implemented by Emagic, 100% cocoa, a potential industry standard in the making! unsure.gif
i've already backed up my 4.8.1 logic folder to CD, DVD, AND firewire drive 'cos i just know that VST etc are ultimately doomed.
unsure.gif rolleyes.gif
this experience, although slow, will be the equivalent of completely replacing a studio and it's equipment in order to stay current. blink.gif
of course there are carbon versions of a lot of the best plugins around
but this is more a question of support from OS & developers for VST etc!

cool.gif sad.gif unsure.gif


--------------------
one for all and all for one...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
post Fri 12 Jul 2002, 03:41
Post #2


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group Icon

Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758




Drool
Drool
Drool
.
.
.
.

One nation under a groove would be great!
The end of this plugin nonsense (well, I can dream…) But it'll need rewriting for host (in the making) and plugs (one day…it's the sound of silence right now) cool.gif


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jray
post Tue 16 Jul 2002, 19:28
Post #3


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 12-Jul 02
From: Seattle - US
Member No.: 5,769




I agree - the wait is going to be way worth it. This will make software development cheaper in the long run, hopefully paying dividends to us the users: more for less.


--------------------
jray : Seattle WA USA
composer - sound design - software engineer

--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Francois Déchery
post Wed 17 Jul 2002, 13:28
Post #4


Webmaster
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,204
Joined: 29-Oct 00
From: Sommieres - FR
Member No.: 11




If Apple reach the goal (making a new standart), and they may be abble to do it, this would certainly help to get an amazing plug-in choice, because when a developper will release a plug-in he wont have to choose if the plug will be VST, MAS, Premiere, TDM, RTAS, AS, Logic.
He will just have to concentrate about the plug-in, not the commercial-marketing stupid issues...

Also, this will also let independant developpers to faslty get the Developpement kit, and to release excellent freeware or shareware...
Did you ever see a freeware TDM or RTAS plug-in?

For example Polyfractus/Dragan, who makes amazing plug-ins on the VST platform, would be more than happy to release it under TDM environnment, but he never succeed to get the needed Developpement kit from Digi....
A new standart would solve all theses things..
But will digi/steinberg/motu follow it, or will they continue to promote their formats? Time will tell!


--------------------
Soif, MacMusic Webmaster

440Software, our new audio software directory
_____________________________________

440Software, notre nouveau site sur les logiciels audio pour Mac, PC et iPhone/iPad
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jray
post Wed 17 Jul 2002, 21:14
Post #5


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 12-Jul 02
From: Seattle - US
Member No.: 5,769




Check out:
http://www.apple.com/macosx/technologies/audio.html

Here's a quote -

"Apple includes several Audio Units in Mac OS X, including a Velocity Engine-optimized reverb and a sample rate converter. Apple will release additional Audio Units in the future...Mac OS X includes a Velocity Engine-optimized Virtual Instrument compatible with the industry standard DownLoadable Sounds (DLS) format. The Mac synthesizer provides applications with high quality, low latency sample playback as well as control for filters and envelopes."

Finally - serious DLS support. This will be important for gaming and who knows...maybe it gives Virtual instrument makers a good leaping off point to make their own cheap samplers. If Core Audio's engine is as good as they say it is, why would you write your own? [read the part about M-Audio finding latencies of only 1 ms] It then becomes an issue of tools and feature sets. I know it's not as simple as all that (you still have to know Core Audio well enough to get this kind of performance) but it's only a matter of time before there are just gobs of cheap choices for audio developers.


--------------------
jray : Seattle WA USA
composer - sound design - software engineer

--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
damann
post Thu 18 Jul 2002, 01:08
Post #6


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044




thanks for the info guys. biggrin.gif
i'm beginning to see life through aqua tinted glasses now, it looks beautiful! rolleyes.gif
soif, is codewarrior capable of developing for cocoa? obviously the x developers kit is necassary, but i'm thinking quite seriously about this.
cool.gif tongue.gif
you know, as they say, you can't halt the march of time...


--------------------
one for all and all for one...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Francois Déchery
post Mon 22 Jul 2002, 22:22
Post #7


Webmaster
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,204
Joined: 29-Oct 00
From: Sommieres - FR
Member No.: 11




QUOTE (damann @ Jul 18 2002, 02:08)
soif, is codewarrior capable of developing for cocoa?

oups not .
i would have to learn C++ (i guess) to be able to developp Cocoa apps.
But at this time, i've learn enough about PHP/mySQL to start learning a new language... wink.gif

But Polyfractus allready knows C++ and i'm sure he plans to realease Cocoa apps... may be something soon wink.gif


--------------------
Soif, MacMusic Webmaster

440Software, our new audio software directory
_____________________________________

440Software, notre nouveau site sur les logiciels audio pour Mac, PC et iPhone/iPad
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deleted
post Mon 22 Jul 2002, 22:37
Post #8


SuperHero
********

Group: Banned
Posts: 1,879
Joined: 24-Feb 02
Member No.: 3,562




Yes, like Soif, i hope all this will unify the plugin market, around an OPEN format, that every develloper could use FREELY.
OS X kernel is open source, so, why not?

I just hope that third party devellopers will release FREE upgrades to their plugins, to support this new native format. At least, at a minor price.
But i'm probably dreaming, in some ways.
Mac OS X is NOT Linux unsure.gif
Bye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
damann
post Tue 23 Jul 2002, 04:44
Post #9


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044




adc is definitely not free!
the basic "x" kit is only $20, but all other sdk's are $700-$1200.
codewarrior does support cocao, and it is of course a "c" derivation. laugh.gif
$700 for codewarrior and a further $700 for apples' cocoa sdk will buy you into audio unit developement. cool.gif
only dragans' knowledge to accumulate and we're winning... huh.gif
m£r!e!


--------------------
one for all and all for one...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
post Sat 24 Aug 2002, 03:53
Post #10





Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0




I like the potential of AudioUnits and MusicDevice. It looks like Apple is SERIOUS about Audio again. I hope Logic OS X supports both VST and AudioUnits. Give me choices and I'll be happy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Sun 1 Dec 2024, 20:39
- © MacMusic 1997-2008