|
|
Is Protools Hd Worth The Money?, upgrading, waiting or simply switching? |
|
|
|
Sun 1 Sep 2002, 03:13
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044
|
i should mention that upgrading to "hd" isn't anywhere near as expensive as you might think it is. i should also mention the fact that i let my pro-tools rig "fizzle out" and have never been happier! digidesign are a bunch of stnuc! their software sucks, give me the porsche anyday. i don't chase tail anymore, let them chase ours! i work in the top studios in london on a regular basis, have done for years, dodgydesign just make the most expensive "multitracking" solution "conceivable", what exactly is that worth? if you work in film, i understand that 192k is potentially necassary, but as far as the music "biz" is concerned, 44.1/48 and some groovy plugs sihts on "fidelity". garbage in/garbage out shall be the whole of the law...
--------------------
one for all and all for one...
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 4 Sep 2002, 01:06
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044
|
hi stuartpa! here at macmusic everybody does what they do for free. digi don't do anything for free! protools free is so limited in functionality that digi are confident that once they have you hooked on it, you'll develope a burning desire to give them money for a more functional version. at which point, you're on the "ladder" that ultimately means you'll pass a few grand their way. emagic for one, have tried this approach a few times. i think you'll find that digi are the only people out there that stand to make as much money from their outlandishly priced upgrades as they do, for this to be viable. you don't actually get "something for nothing" in this world. digi software sucks in comparison. all the regular pt users will hate me for saying this, but in the meantime, on a professional basis, i have to use this software to earn money. it 'aint pretty! i've also been in this industry since before sequencers were invented. yes, an atari, mpc, or whatever, can compete with any of this sophisticated stuff. it's really about what YOU do with it. please don't believe that protools is "ultimately" free! i'd rather try some demos of software that openly wants my money if i decide i like it, than follow this phoney route. end of rant...
--------------------
one for all and all for one...
|
|
|
|
|
Fri 27 Sep 2002, 17:44
|
Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0
|
QUOTE (xfiles @ Aug 29 2002, 17:27) All theses points lead me to reconsider my next investments. Considering it is nowaday easy to find mix farms at an affordable price and that ProTools mix systems are rock solid, I would suggest any "Digidesign shareholder" to wait and see...
Meanwhile I will certainly buy a new G4 just to experiment alternative solutions. The main problems with theses new compititors is that they are good looking, they offer great possibilities, they support many popular standarts and are a hell of a lot cheaper. hi xfiles Thanx for your wise suggestion. I was ready to buy a PT hd till i read your post. I did find a TDM core syst at an incredible price and then found 2 very cheap mixfarms. It was a such great deal that i am now planning on buying an brand new G4 My next step... Logic audio 5 for pro midi and great VSTI Thanx a lot for your precious help Steeve From NY
|
|
|
|
|
Tue 1 Oct 2002, 07:00
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 08-Jun 02
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 4,998
|
EVERYONE that has been reading this post, would you guys agree that digi has allways kept there products in the POST demain?
i mean, first you get the automation, then 24bit, then 192 then? there prices have allways kept there poducts out of reach from music end users and into the BIG rooms that charge the BIG bucks.
i gather there market targets are the money making studios and 75%+ of there annual tax expense budget, sounds correct to you guys?
Even in logic 5 i cant seem to get a perfect break on automation , its not as accurate as pro tools at all, there audio editing needs TONS of work to improve logics accuracy, and lots of logic audio is flaky and un reliable, yet emagic has still been the best UP digi's crack!!, no one else comes closer then emagic., even with there own LOGIC CONTROL/PRO CONROL clone that you get complaints too with regarding some faders are not accurate too and have been returned to shops.
But one thing for sure is when i do POST work in a room that has a PTHD system is that it feels the closest to tape ever, and tape has no BIT limit!!!, also Pro Tools is SOLID!!,
So what im getting at is someone has to be the one to PUSH it all to the max, although we have to agree its a buisness and they also push this too far as well.
But i have one thing to say to digi, why dont they make a fully step up system for all levels with pay as you go add on hardware per track, then everyone can benefir and especially digi been able to garantee there customer a REAl upgradable investment, and not a hoax like the last 11 years they pulled off and keep getting away with.
ofcourse we all know this CraP but no one sais anything about it, thought i would again here.
--------------------
HARDWARE---> APPLE G4, 450MP, 520MB, 4x80Gigata's w/accord pci ata card, 2x15"apple cinema flatpanels with additional radeon (mac eddition)-Powerd a dr.bott Diviator.OS---> OS9.2/OS X.1.1.5.. MUSIC SOFTWARE---> emagic-LogicAudio 5.1.3 with a esx24 sampler , PRO TOOLS (m-BOX & MIX +), Absynth, FM7, PRO52/SUPER-NOVA, Battery, Reason2, Rebirth, Waves3.2+, AKAI & SCii LIBRARY, Roxio5/Jam5,...VIDEO+ GRAPHIC SOWAFTRE---> PhotoShop 7.5, Final Cut Pro 3, Premiere 6, Cleaner Pro 5, After Effects 5.5, qt 6.
|
|
|
|
|
Wed 30 Oct 2002, 10:43
|
Junior Member
Group: Members
Posts: 103
Joined: 30-Oct 02
From: Los Angeles - US
Member No.: 8,882
|
Hi, this is my first posting. I'm a mate of Damann, and I'm based in LA with my studio after leaving the UK. To begin with, I would like to clarify my political veiwpoint. I have a PT TDM system using Logic 99% of the time as the front end on a G4. I also have a dual gig G4/VST2 rig with a MOTU 2408, also running Logic. I refuse to touch dodgy's 888 interface (I've heard better top end coming from a glass of coca cola) or how about their new 192 (looks like a piece of crap, what pathetic led metering, if it sounds like it looks, no thanks). I have an Apogee AD-8000 and have come across some very interesting test results comparing Bum Factory's Pultec EQ with the magnificent UAD-1 card's Pultec EQ. I Eq'd a bass on the UAD-1 Pultec plug, then passed the signal through a TDM channel via lightpipe, inserted a Bum Factory Pultec across it, and lo and behold, the 50hz bottom end generated by the UAD-1 Pultec was CANCELLED OUT (my speaker cones stopped moving) when switching the Bum Factory's Pultec out of bypass mode (all controls flat). And just to imagine some greenhorn buying the Bum Factory version (because of their ball & chain PT system) for around the same price that you can buy the UAD-1 PCI card and get all those great plugs bundled free!! One could misconstrue another as being a monkey without a brain to buy into the profools/notools HD "solution". What is all this crap about HD sounding so good anyway?! If you get an Apogee convertor (expensive but worthwhile) you can interface anything to it. The AMBUS cards available are A) ADAT lightpipe B) Firewire - direct connect to your ASIO host) and C) dodgydesign interface (if you so happen to own a TDM/Mix/Mixplus system) and D) DA-88 interface . Beyond that, why bother at all with dodgy? I keep thinking of a large ship in the middle of the atlantic with not enough lifeboats to go around... Children & lazy programmers first! Interestingly enough, dodgy have recently coerced Universal Audio to release their LA-2A, Urei & Pultec plugs on the HD "platform". I see many PT heads migrating to VST2 once they realise they can have the whole shooting match for around the price of one TDM plug-in of the same breed Just thought I'd share my thoughts with you...
--------------------
Nobody can take from you what you give freely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|