MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
6 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Protools--vs--????, lost in the digi jungle----HELP!!
Mr.T
post Mon 26 Aug 2002, 23:48
Post #31


SuperHero
********

Group: Members
Posts: 9,465
Joined: 04-Nov 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,244




Ohhhhhhh Newbie !!!!!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deleted
post Tue 27 Aug 2002, 02:48
Post #32


SuperHero
********

Group: Banned
Posts: 1,879
Joined: 24-Feb 02
Member No.: 3,562




QUOTE (damann @ Aug 25 2002, 04:23)
put mister 001 in front of an ssl desk and you'll find that what he does with it doesn't sound anything like as good as what mr ssl trained engineer does with an 001.

Mmhh.. In the same situation, just replace the 001 with a 896 (just to name one :-) and you WILL hear the difference.
Sorry, but the A/D stage is VERY importnat, Digi001 is just not in the competition (really poor sound & dynamic IMHO, i did comparisons, even if subjectives)...

Sorry if i misanderstood the original post...

Bye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
beezkneez
post Wed 25 Sep 2002, 11:30
Post #33


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 25-Sep 02
From: Dobbs Ferry - US
Member No.: 7,930




hey i read that sting is recording right now using an m-box, a mac, and logic... italy or somewhere i ferget but that's gotta be encouraging for all us mac musicians
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
damann
post Thu 26 Sep 2002, 01:55
Post #34


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044




hi beezkneez,
what this means in reality is that he's signed an endorsement with digi and they asked him to do some promotion work for the mbox.
i'm sure he's probably using it occasionally for putting ideas down when he's not in the studio, but will confidently place my bet that he's NOT making the album on this setup... laugh.gif
digi would obviously like to encourage us mac musicians to buy an mbox!
don't believe the hype. tongue.gif


--------------------
one for all and all for one...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rickenbacker
post Thu 26 Sep 2002, 10:42
Post #35


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 645
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Broughton
Member No.: 4,705




On this subject, is anyone out there using an Mbox with Logic? If so, how's that working out for you? I know we're not supposed to use the Mbox with anything other than PTLE (Digi frown on such activity!) but some reports from the frontline would be interesting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
damann
post Thu 26 Sep 2002, 14:39
Post #36


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044




a good point,
yes, it works fine with logic. wink.gif
there's an asio driver for it available on the steinberg site, that digi don't seem to want to mention! unsure.gif


--------------------
one for all and all for one...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rickenbacker
post Fri 27 Sep 2002, 11:57
Post #37


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 645
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Broughton
Member No.: 4,705




Hmm, interesting. I'm still caught in this weird OS 9/OS X limbo - I've got Logic 5.3.0, but not many interfaces have drivers ready for OS X. I think the Mbox has a decent sound for recording, but what are the chances of getting it to work in OS X? blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
damann
post Sat 28 Sep 2002, 01:53
Post #38


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 11-Jun 02
From: London - UK
Member No.: 5,044




realistically, there is no limbo state,
os9 provides a great resource for making music, osx, well, dosen't!
the only reason to be making music with osx right now is your wanting to... wink.gif
it will take at least a year for osx to gain the support that 9 already has! in the meantime, is an os more important than what you do with it?
i don't think so...


--------------------
one for all and all for one...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rickenbacker
post Sat 28 Sep 2002, 11:25
Post #39


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 645
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Broughton
Member No.: 4,705




"the only reason to be making music with osx right now is your wanting to... "

Yep! I'm not alone in this, though, am I? tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
urbanmatador
post Sat 28 Sep 2002, 22:53
Post #40


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 28-Sep 02
From: Portland - US
Member No.: 8,052




> "the only reason to be making music with osx right now is your
> wanting to... "

> Yep! I'm not alone in this, though, am I?

i agree, audio in osx isn't really viable yet, but i also agree with rickenbacker, i'm currently in the limbo state of using os 9 because that's what works, but preferring osx... i'm basically waiting to see whether protools or digital performer gets to osx first...

anyone have comparisions between those two (digi vs. motu)?


--------------------
there can be hours between the so and the what of the so
www.notquite.net
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Thu 19 Dec 2024, 01:25
- © 440 Forums 2011