|
|
|
The Latency Problems In Logic Pro |
|
|
|
Tue 21 Jun 2005, 14:13
|
Moderator
Group: Team
Posts: 336
Joined: 17-Feb 05
From: La Laguna - ES
Member No.: 60,731
|
It does not matter to me what Protools does. I use Logic, and have paid by him. Therefore it is to Logic to that I must to him demand. He is unacceptable that in a program like Logic, the latency that listening when you record through a Bus, must fix it by hand and your ear. While this is thus, Logic will not be a professional program.
|
|
|
|
|
Tue 21 Jun 2005, 14:35
|
Moderator
Group: Team
Posts: 336
Joined: 17-Feb 05
From: La Laguna - ES
Member No.: 60,731
|
I do not agree. Timing is not so difficult to solve. The audio one must return to its site. With Creamware I do not have that problem, and it is not indeed a modern system. He would be peculiar that Logic said to him to its users who if they want routing with the 64 Bus, it buys a SSL.
Gabriel, make me one supplies.
|
|
|
|
|
Tue 21 Jun 2005, 15:04
|
Moderator
Group: Team
Posts: 336
Joined: 17-Feb 05
From: La Laguna - ES
Member No.: 60,731
|
Sometimes the impediments let you grow. Your recommendation is an example. I continue thinking that Logic must solve this problem. But your answer is intelligent. I do not imagine to Peter fighting against the latencies in its Real world. But everything is possible, and now more.
|
|
|
|
|
Tue 21 Jun 2005, 15:35
|
Moderator
Group: Team
Posts: 336
Joined: 17-Feb 05
From: La Laguna - ES
Member No.: 60,731
|
The better is fixe automatically without losing the possibility of doing it manually. Because indeed, sometimes he is better to do it manually. But Logic always forces to you has to do it manually and this means times to waste time, and others to cut your creative rhythm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|