  |
 Os X Sample Rate Conversion = Horrible Performance |
 Wed 31 Mar 2004, 01:38
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 04-Sep 03 From: Baltimore - US Member No.: 24,165  |
At my job, I deal with very large WAVE files (around 1.5gig) recorded at 24/96.
The client gets data CDs with the 24/96 files on them, and also audio CDs of each file. We use PCs in our sound lab, but I recently aquired two Macs from our graphics department. On the PCs, we use Wavelab's batch processor to convert the 24/96 files to 16/44.1. This usual averages about 3 minutes file. So today, I set up a batch process in Peak to convert the 24/96 files to 16/44.1, and to my amazement/disappointment, it was taking up to 40 MINUTES a file! That is practically real time! The PCs we use are standard Pentium 4's with about a gig or ram. The Mac I use is a 733MHz G4 PowerMac with 1.25 gigs of ram. I just don't know what else to say. In addition to this devastating revalation, I have also found Peak and the dicontinued Spark to be less than comparable to the power of Sound Forge or Wavelab. I won't be giving up my Macs anytime soon, but if anyone has any insight on the these issues, please bring your two cents to this post. Thanks. |
 |
 
|
|
Wed 31 Mar 2004, 05:25
Post
#2
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Members Posts: 265 Joined: 05-Dec 03 From: Memphis - US Member No.: 30,424 |
i agree that peak is very slow. i have had this in the back of my mine since coming over to mac. i wonder what the deal is?
happy recording, editbrain |
|
|
|
 Thu 1 Apr 2004, 00:35
Post
#3
|
|
 Maniac Member Group: Members Posts: 899 Joined: 12-Oct 01 From: Kirkland Member No.: 2,002 |
 wrong app for the job, DSP Quattro.
-------------------- G-Dub
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 1 Apr 2004, 00:52
Post
#4
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 04-Sep 03 From: Baltimore - US Member No.: 24,165 |
I downloaded a demo of DSP-Quattro and it took just as long. In addition to that, every edit made to the waveform required the program to redraw the overview! With a 1.5gig file, that is an unacceptable amount of time to sit and wait after each edit.
|
|
|
|
|
Thu 1 Apr 2004, 01:35
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 55 Joined: 04-Jan 04 From: Brisbane - AU Member No.: 32,416 |
You could try Amadeus II or Sound Edit?
I really really wish someone would hurry up and port over a 'GOOD' aiff editing program like soundforge or wavelab (perhaps calling it aifflab!?) |
|
|
|
|
Thu 1 Apr 2004, 03:08
Post
#6
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 265 Joined: 05-Dec 03 From: Memphis - US Member No.: 30,424 |
why would it be the wrong app if it is offered?
also this seems to be a problem with the way that mac handles files in a stereo sound editor. this can't be the first time someone has complained about this. i am all for mac being a logic user and all, but the platform cannot compete with windows as long as soundforge is windows only. maybe this is a serious flaw in the platform and that is why soundforge has not been ported. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
