Replies
|
|
 Fri 25 Nov 2005, 13:53
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 07-Jul 03
From: Nottingham - UK
Member No.: 20,901
|
QUOTE (abcdaniel @ Nov 24 2005, 12:16) so maybe the slightest bit of peak limiting on the original track is a good idea. Agree on that, Beya? Haven't done it much myself... Well the whole idea behind parallel or upward compression is to preserve transients, but failing the fact that a slight reduction in db for the channel doesn't have the desired effect, then yes introduce slight limiting. Beya
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
 neesley Compressor Mon 21 Nov 2005, 10:29 rickenbacker Hardware or software? If software, what host seque... Tue 22 Nov 2005, 13:36 neesley I'm using ProTools 6.9.2 with a DIGI002R. The... Tue 22 Nov 2005, 18:13 loudstring Try using waves L2/L3 ultamaximizer it can be very... Tue 22 Nov 2005, 18:19 beyaRecords USR (www.usrplugins.com) are due to release the AU... Wed 23 Nov 2005, 08:51 rickenbacker Compressors are tricky things to get right - too l... Wed 23 Nov 2005, 11:08 gkdoty Have you tried the
Free Digidesign Dynamics III Di... Wed 23 Nov 2005, 21:36 abcdaniel The 1176 is a free download at digidesign http://w... Wed 23 Nov 2005, 22:50 neesley Everything I've read so far has been great... Wed 23 Nov 2005, 22:53 abcdaniel Hmm, if you use that kind of ratio you should get ... Thu 24 Nov 2005, 10:14 beyaRecords Try 'parallel compression' which allow you... Thu 24 Nov 2005, 10:25 abcdaniel Correction: It wasn't "some 90s DBX compr... Thu 24 Nov 2005, 12:16 neesley abcdaniel: Thanks for the tip on the attack. Come... Fri 25 Nov 2005, 13:22
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
Compressor
