MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected

tunepoet

Profile
Personal Photo
Avatar
Members
**
Member
Rating
 
Options
Options
Pro Infos

Musicians / Composers

On the creative edge
Personal Info
Gender Not Set
Born April 2, 1967 (57 years old)
94903 San Rafael
United States
tunepoet doesn't have a personal statement currently.
Statistics
Joined: 17-Jun 03
Profile Views: 2,771*
Last Seen: Thu 5 Apr 2007, 23:47
Local Time: Fri 15 Nov 2024, 23:06
50 posts (0.01 per day)
Contact Information
AIM No Information
Yahoo No Information
ICQ No Information
MSN No Information
* Profile views updated each hour
Topics
Posts
Blog
Comments
Friends
My Content
3 Sep 2004
This may be a redundant question (most of them are), but if you are a person who enjoys giving advice on the matter, your help is much appreciated.

Heyo,
I have been using an eMac 700 now, for a time, but my software has so out powered my rig, that I am looking into purchasing a G5. But from there, I do not know which of the G5 Towers would be the wisest to purchase. What I would like to do is pile up loads of soft synths in my sequencers, and never fear that my processor is gonna go on a coffee break.

I have heard that you can run a large numbers of plug-in’s on even the 1.8 G5, so, with that in mind, would there be a reason I should choose the 2.5 G5 tower instead?

The take no chances approach would dictate the 2.5, but would that be over kill? Is there anyone here who has run multiple instances of Reaktor or Tassman, or other mega hungry programs on the 1.8, and felt they would never need any more power than that? And is there a discernible difference in performance between the 1.8, the 2.0, and the 2.5 G5? Thanks for your help.

Blessings,
Damon

huh.gif
Last Visitors
tunepoet has no visitors to display.

Comments
Other users have left no comments for tunepoet.

Friends
There are no friends to display.
Lo-Fi Version - Sat 16 Nov 2024, 08:06
- © 440 Forums 2011