MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Could Do With Host Cpu Drain Comparason
Chris C.L
post Mon 24 Oct 2005, 10:03
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 18-Jul 04
From: London - UK
Member No.: 47,155




I am using cubas SE and need to upgrade. My mac finds cubase hard work. I always thought Logic would be worse but I am not so sure now.

Has any one here got either cubase + logic or cubase + live 5 on their mac?
If so do you find one of these to be lighter on the CPU than the other?

Any advice would be welcomed as a sequencer chance is a big step.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
post Mon 24 Oct 2005, 23:11
Post #2


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 899
Joined: 12-Oct 01
From: Kirkland
Member No.: 2,002




If you are using OSX Logic is the most effecient, followed by DP.

Cubase is the biggest CPU hog and has the highest minimum requirements of all the Mac DAWs

Live is ok but lacks support for Altivec, and dual processors.

I own them all except SX because it's performance was so bad that I sold it to a PC freiend.

cool.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chris C.L
post Tue 25 Oct 2005, 09:58
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 18-Jul 04
From: London - UK
Member No.: 47,155




Cheers for that gboudleyou
I am glad I noticed the system requrements for cubase when I checking features for upgrage tha other day. Just as I suspected then.
I might be able to keep my much loved G4 imac after all biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Thu 28 Mar 2024, 12:29
- © MacMusic 1997-2008