Machine Opinion, Will a power book have enough power? |
Sat 15 Mar 2003, 22:31
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 15-Mar 03 From: Midlothian - US Member No.: 14,418 |
I'm getting ready to upgrade from a B/W G3 350. I would like to run Reason 2.0 and Cubase SX w/ Rewire (OS X). I'm debating between a dual 1.25 Mac and an 876 mhz or 1 gig Powerbook. Has anyone worked with either of these setups? I'm thinking about going portable because we have a baby on the way and I don't want to be making a lot of noise at home (I have about 3 hours to kill between shows on my gig and it would be great to get some work done.)
Thanks for any input. |
|
|
Sat 15 Mar 2003, 23:24
Post
#2
|
|
Moderator In Chief (MIC) Group: Editors Posts: 15,189 Joined: 23-Dec 01 From: Paris - FR Member No.: 2,758 |
The first thing to think about between desktop and laptop is the the former is usually more expensive and a bit less powerfull. So the choice for a Powerbook needs to be motivated only if you know that you need to be really mobile.
The dual 1,25 will be way more powerfull, expandable. Now for a Reason/SX setup it depend also of what kind of things you do with. Do you want to run loads of plugins? VSTis? -------------------- Our Classifeds • Nos petites annonces • Terms Of Service / Conditions d'Utilisation • Forum Rules / Règles des Forums • MacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki? BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki? |
|
|
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 04:25
Post
#3
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 21-Feb 03 From: Wailuku - US Member No.: 12,847 |
QUOTE The first thing to think about between desktop and laptop is the the former is usually more expensive and a bit less powerfull. I'm pretty sure that you mean the "latter" (the laptop), don't you? |
|
|
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 06:23
Post
#4
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 18 Joined: 09-Jan 03 From: North Cairns - AU Member No.: 10,612 |
I tried a dual 1.2 with a 20" monitor in a shop . it only had 256 megs ram . I have to say it was the fastest most responsive machine I have tried . really slick .
there wasn't much background noise in the shop it seemed really quite to me . this was a big problem with old desktops . unless you require portablility I would go with something like this . they are just much more powerful versatile machines and will serve you for longer time . the other thing is only buy when you have the time to use , because if you buy it later you will get cheaper or more powerful machine for same money . if you need portability buy 2nd hand laptop and have good desktop as well . good luck . |
|
|
Sun 16 Mar 2003, 15:06
Post
#5
|
|
Moderator In Chief (MIC) Group: Editors Posts: 15,189 Joined: 23-Dec 01 From: Paris - FR Member No.: 2,758 |
Thanks Macmaui spot on!
Methink it was time to bo to bed -------------------- Our Classifeds • Nos petites annonces • Terms Of Service / Conditions d'Utilisation • Forum Rules / Règles des Forums • MacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki? BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki? |
|
|
Wed 19 Mar 2003, 03:42
Post
#6
|
|
Maniac Member Group: Members Posts: 899 Joined: 12-Oct 01 From: Kirkland Member No.: 2,002 |
I think gidfiddler is on track, if you are a business I'd suggest a desktop first. If you encounter common hardware problems, with a desktop, parts may be available at any computer shop. The components in laptops are more specialized or proprietary, and your only repair option may be a return to Apple, or an authorized dealer. If a hardrive fails in my desktop, in ten minutes I can go to CompUSA and be up and running in less than an hour. But if your hardrive dies on a laptop it's a trip to the shop. For my business, I would use a laptop as a secondary machine. I'm in the decision making process now for a laptop. -------------------- G-Dub
|
|
|
Wed 19 Mar 2003, 05:35
Post
#7
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 15-Mar 03 From: Midlothian - US Member No.: 14,418 |
Thanks for all the useful input. I think I've settled on the dual 1.25.
Chris |
|
|
Thu 20 Mar 2003, 11:51
Post
#8
|
|
Maniac Member Group: Members Posts: 645 Joined: 17-May 02 From: Broughton Member No.: 4,705 |
I'll just mention that you can still get 1.25 DP Macs that boot into OS 9. They cost a little more, but if you think you might want the safety net of being able to boot into OS 9 sometimes they might be worth a look.
Not that Apple make them easy to find: you have to go to the Apple Store and select the PowerMacs link, so you get the page with the four latest models on. Then in the top-right-hand corner is a link that says "OS 9 systems". Click that and you get a choice of two machines: the devil is in the detail, but in some respects they're better specced than the equivalent OS X-only machines. |
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: