The Reason Sequencer And Me..., What makes it sub-par |
|
|
|
Sat 30 Nov 2002, 17:28
|
Senior Member
Group: Members
Posts: 296
Joined: 10-Aug 02
From: Rimghobb - UA
Member No.: 6,734
|
I want to love the Reason 2.0 sequencer in OS X like I love the rest of the program, but it is just unlovable. Here is one curmudgeon's opinion of some of the major reason's why, in no particular order: 1. No way to select all events on one note (in order to transpose or otherwise fiddle with them) without zooming out and dragging over all of them. A major and repetitive pain in numerous parts of the anatomy. 2. No dotted-note support. (!) 3. Can't horizontally resize sequencer window panes. (I mean, this *is* the 21st century.) Better use short names for your tracks, and don't put unique identifiers only at the end of the names. (E.g.: "Violin Section AdvOrch," "Violin Section Miroslav," etc. About all you'll be able to see is "Violin Sec" unless you go click on each name, because you can't resize the pane. Which is a...pain.) 4. No batch "human feel" function. 5. No functional or useful randomizing of velocities. 6. The *colors*. My eyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyeeees! 7. No way to sync views between tracks, and no way to view multiple tracks in one editor window. This is one of the biggest liabilities of the sequencer, and causes endless scrolling around and resizing of the sequencer window when going to edit different tracks. Every time you click on a track (if you've changed anything) you are in a completely different magnification and position in the song, and it is extremely disorienting, and makes editing contrapuntal or harmony parts between voices cumbersome to the point of "why bother." This kind of separate control of track view is great as an option, but when it's the only non-option available, it's just awful. If there has to be only one way, this one is probably the worst possible. 8. No automatic setting of current values for controller lanes, e.g. volume. IOW, if you have the volume you want set on an NN-19 or NN-XT patch, but then want to put in a volume curve at measure 182, selecting the controller lane and selecting volume just gives you a blank lane with no indication of the current volume setting of the device. You then have to go to the device and get a readout off of its volume knob to know where to set the default volume for that track in order to then draw in your curve. 9. Along with the above: NO cursor-position feedback! This is just inexcusable. There's no information in, e.g., a controller lane about precisely what level of the vertical scale for that controller your cursor is at before you click to enter a value. 10. Along with no way to select all the events on a single note (#1 above), there is no universal track "event selecter." I'll compare this to the one in DP where you can add endless parameters for narrowing down and defining the events on a track that you want to munge. This is invaluable in a complex part, especially if you want to find and select *every* sixteenth note that falls in the third sixteenth-note-position of the third beat in every measure. If you want to do it in Reason, better pack a lunch. There are more, but these are some of the major stumbling blocks I've encountered. Love to hear others' views and experiences. Maybe we can bundle 'em up and humbly send them to Propellarheads with cap in hand, begging for an upgrade.
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Levon River The Reason Sequencer And Me... Sat 30 Nov 2002, 17:28 Synthetic sounds to me like you are in need of Logic more th... Sat 30 Nov 2002, 17:52 Levon River QUOTE (Synthetic @ Nov 30 2002, 16:52)sounds ... Sun 1 Dec 2002, 10:51 Mugwomp Do you know what dongles are? They're for copy... Mon 2 Dec 2002, 07:58 twelve why not just rewire the output of reason into your... Mon 2 Dec 2002, 23:19 Levon River QUOTE (Mugwomp @ Dec 2 2002, 06:58)Do you kno... Tue 3 Dec 2002, 00:42 ryosode Okay ,so Levon River's point taken. These feat... Tue 3 Dec 2002, 00:48 twelve QUOTE (ryosode @ Dec 2 2002, 23:48)As for ReW... Tue 3 Dec 2002, 06:55
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|