 Mbox Vs. Digi 002 Rack |
 Thu 15 Apr 2004, 14:29
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: 21-Dec 03 From: Pittsburgh - US Member No.: 31,548  |
I'm wondering which audio interface would be better for my needs. I'd like to record voice and acoustic guitar using two different mics and afterward doing some harmony vocals and perhaps a second guitar track and some bass. The real problem I want to avoid is major latency. Will I have substantially less with the firewire digi 002r than with the mbox. Some users have said that the latency with mbox is not a problem while others have said it is a true annoyance. Just wondering what some of you users of either audio interface have to say. Also, how many audio inputs can the digi 002r take at a time? I know the mbox can only take two, which of course is pretty limited.
|
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
|
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 03:03
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member  Group: Members Posts: 51 Joined: 02-Aug 02 From: Sydney - AU Member No.: 6,491 |
one thing to be aware of when using an M-Box on a mac...
"When you record into Pro Tools LE Mac there is a latency of 164 samples. All tracks recorded into Pro Tools have 164 samples of latency, but you will not notice this with the first track unless you have a MIDI click, or a recorded click to play along with. Thus, when you record the second track/pass, you will hear latency when the two tracks are played together. After recording your second track/pass into Pro Tools LE Mac, adjust the newly recorded audio track to compensate for the 164 samples of latency. Select the second pass of audio with the Grabber Tool. Edit Menu > Shift. Click "Earlier" and type in 164 in the "Samples" field. Click "OK". Now, Pro Tools will locate the audio 164 samples earlier. "Shift" each track or recorded pass back by 164 samples immediately after recording. If you are stacking up tracks, you definitely want them all to be in sync as each new one is recorded." you can find the full article here http://answerbase.digidesign.com/detail.cfm?DID=7868 there has been a lot of discussion about this on the digidesign user forums and the main bone of contention is that there is no mention of it in the manuals, so untill you chance upon it in a forum your overdubs will end up 164 samples behind your 1st tracks. if you ask me, the failure to inform users is unacceptable and I have let digidesign know that I am PISSED OFF!! bjkiwi |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
JPSpecial Mbox Vs. Digi 002 Rack Thu 15 Apr 2004, 14:29
PristineRec I've never used an Mbox, but I have never had ... Thu 15 Apr 2004, 15:30 Barb I own both the MBox and the digi002. I use the MB... Fri 16 Apr 2004, 13:52 kolo Look, you only get latency if you are using the co... Fri 16 Apr 2004, 14:12 beltunabob Sorry, I'm an ABSOLUTE newbie. Latency means..... Fri 16 Apr 2004, 14:33 kolo Latency as in LATE. That is You are playing or sin... Fri 16 Apr 2004, 16:13 JPSpecial What is the difference between using the computer ... Sat 17 Apr 2004, 03:57 beltunabob OK i understand Latency. What book(s) are recommen... Sat 17 Apr 2004, 14:36 kolo I don't know much about the Mbox. But direct m... Sat 17 Apr 2004, 16:12 arvidtp yes, the Mbox does direct monitoring. It's har... Sat 17 Apr 2004, 16:56 arvidtp Yeah - what's up with that??? It is weird that... Mon 19 Apr 2004, 03:27
bjkiwi this is only an issue with the MBox on the Mac. I ... Wed 21 Apr 2004, 03:52 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
