 Mbox Vs. Digi 002 Rack |
 Thu 15 Apr 2004, 14:29
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: 21-Dec 03 From: Pittsburgh - US Member No.: 31,548  |
I'm wondering which audio interface would be better for my needs. I'd like to record voice and acoustic guitar using two different mics and afterward doing some harmony vocals and perhaps a second guitar track and some bass. The real problem I want to avoid is major latency. Will I have substantially less with the firewire digi 002r than with the mbox. Some users have said that the latency with mbox is not a problem while others have said it is a true annoyance. Just wondering what some of you users of either audio interface have to say. Also, how many audio inputs can the digi 002r take at a time? I know the mbox can only take two, which of course is pretty limited.
|
 |
 
|
Posts in this topic
PristineRec I've never used an Mbox, but I have never had ... Thu 15 Apr 2004, 15:30 Barb I own both the MBox and the digi002. I use the MB... Fri 16 Apr 2004, 13:52 kolo Look, you only get latency if you are using the co... Fri 16 Apr 2004, 14:12 beltunabob Sorry, I'm an ABSOLUTE newbie. Latency means..... Fri 16 Apr 2004, 14:33 kolo Latency as in LATE. That is You are playing or sin... Fri 16 Apr 2004, 16:13 JPSpecial What is the difference between using the computer ... Sat 17 Apr 2004, 03:57 beltunabob OK i understand Latency. What book(s) are recommen... Sat 17 Apr 2004, 14:36 kolo I don't know much about the Mbox. But direct m... Sat 17 Apr 2004, 16:12 arvidtp yes, the Mbox does direct monitoring. It's har... Sat 17 Apr 2004, 16:56 bjkiwi one thing to be aware of when using an M-Box on a ... Mon 19 Apr 2004, 03:03 arvidtp Yeah - what's up with that??? It is weird that... Mon 19 Apr 2004, 03:27
bjkiwi this is only an issue with the MBox on the Mac. I ... Wed 21 Apr 2004, 03:52  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
