MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
> Loss Of Faith, tepid digital waters
jesse
post Mon 5 Apr 2004, 02:00
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 31-Mar 04
From: Montreal - CA
Member No.: 39,828




I am feeling rather defeated. last year i purchased an imac 800mgz, 256, and I have yet to match the stability of my fostex fourtrack. the consept of latency is entirely new to me. So I ask myself, and all of you, why would anyone purchase a 2500$ (canadian) machine then purchase 150 dollars worth of software (tracktion) and another 250 on a decent usb interface. currently i am using imic (60$) and i hate it. Back in the good old days, when a fourtrack cost 300 bucks (1994) there was no such animal as "latency". why then ten years and 3000 dollars later do i find myself in a less productive and more expencive situation? And all for a marginal increase in sound quality. My question is this: how much more do I have to spend to be able to find a program and input/output device that is comperable to the fostex cassette machine i had (still do) ten years ago? Have I gone through all this just eliminate the dreaded tape hiss?! Does anyone else feel like they have been hoodwinked by the glitz and gloss of a sleaker digital future?
I am only twenty-seven and already the future looks dimmer than the past.
...triing hard not to become a luddite...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
DEVIOUS
post Tue 6 Apr 2004, 02:41
Post #2


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 25-Mar 04
From: London - UK
Member No.: 39,333




I am looking into the digital 8 track world and wanting to add midi too. Just as a thought, how does a hardware digital 8 track fare with the latency problem. I just had the idea of buying a piece of kit like the Zoom MRS802BCD (http://www.zzounds.com/item--ZOMMRS802CD) and having a neat complete 'idea pad' and hoping that with the provided usb connection these ideas could be developed and moved around in a sequencer on my mac. Would this work? Anybody know?

I understand the frustration of this digital stuff- I mean, the less complications, the more time that can be spent on the ideas. After all, this is what it's all about isn't it?

D.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Fri 20 Dec 2024, 23:19
- © MacMusic 1997-2008