440 Forums > English > Mac Music > Audio, MIDI, DSP Cards and Interfaces, Controllers > Other Controllers, Interfaces, DSP Cards Is There Any Creamware-user In The Room?, F.Hund announcement |
 Wed 4 Feb 2004, 21:00
Post
#1
|
|
|
SuperHero  Group: Members Posts: 4,781 Joined: 19-Nov 02 From: Bruxelles - BE Member No.: 9,408  |
hello,
after the recent news received from F.Hund, how do you feel? what would you do? buy a Noah, move to another souncard? SFP is a very smart concept,including a complete virtual studio except the sequencer, but with some very good synths and effects! and...converters! i'm using a pulsar 2 running under os9.2.2 on a g4 bi-pro 1ghz, and i love this card, but what's the future? carrying out the developpement of an osx support "is not a priority"! gosh!! we,the mac-users, are we so weak? our market does interest Motu,M-audio,Digidesign, and so on... i'm really disappointed by what i read. do you have any feeling about? thanks for any anxwer    
-------------------- MacPro dual 2.66 - 8 Go - SL10.6.6- DP 7.2.1 - RME FFCE 800 - URS, Sonnox, Stilwell, Nomad Factory, Kontakt 4.2.2, Trillian, Stylus, EZ drummer, SD2, UVIworkstation, Altiverb - KRK - JBL
Neve 8801 - Brauner - Roland A-37, etc. |
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
|
Thu 25 Mar 2004, 16:28
Post
#2
|
|
 Newbie Group: Members Posts: 9 Joined: 13-Jan 04 From: Puteaux - FR Member No.: 33,073 |
Hi all,
I just poster a message to ask about OSX compatibility .... but reading this thread answers my questions very well! I have a PC running a Pulsar 2 and I recently got a Powerbook G4 and fell in love with it and OSX. I was thinking of buying a new audio interface to plug my hardware instruments on the Mac but I feel it's a shame not to use the Pulsar 2. So I had the brilliant idea to get a G5! Yeah ... lol ... But, with no PCI-X and OSX compatibility, it's very unlikely I do that Too bad for my Pulsar 2, cause I'm not going back to the PC world. I am tired of having to set up the whole thing for 20 minutes before being able to produce any sound. And no my PC is not dedicated to music only and yes my studio is well organized (i don't have that many instruments or gear) and I feel that it would work better with OSX, even not dedicated to music only ... ... or is it the routing thing of the pulsar that makes things so powerful but also more complicated ? Vincent |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
melenko Is There Any Creamware-user In The Room? Wed 4 Feb 2004, 21:00
lepetitmartien Hi everybody!
THIS is important, Creamware is... Thu 5 Feb 2004, 23:39 melenko sorry to repeat my demand!
is it possible ther... Fri 6 Feb 2004, 20:06 criba I am using Pulsar Plus and Pulsar SRB on my Mac G4... Sun 15 Feb 2004, 10:24 whomper I was a PC user with 3 x Pulsar 2 cards and many e... Sun 15 Feb 2004, 16:46 melenko thanks for your answers,
and in a certain way, you... Sun 15 Feb 2004, 18:11
melenko Hello,
go to the forums of creamware,
the latest n... Thu 25 Mar 2004, 19:36 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
