MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
> Do I need a mixer with 828?, Can I go through the 828 or do I need a mixer?
post Fri 14 Jun 2002, 16:37
Post #1





Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0




Alright, this may be a dumb and/or obvious question...

I'm setting up a new iMac 800mhz with a MOTU 828 and my question is, do I need to run vocals, miked amps, drums, and such through a mixer first or can I go directly to the 828 and then to the iMac.

If I should not go direct to the 828, will something like a basic Mackie board work (which we use for live performances so it would be a pain to dislodge it from the rest of the PA setup) or would preamps suffice?  

Thanks in advance.

www.theslowtrain.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
jimmydonny
post Sun 16 Jun 2002, 17:36
Post #2


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 16-Jun 02
Member No.: 5,124




hi-
i was checking this forum out to see if someone might be able to offer advice in resolving probs i was having with DP3/audiodesk ... i think they were caused by VST wrapper... if you have a 'DP3 cannot open the type of file, blah blah blah, file made by newer version of audiodesk, etc. etc., try ditching all VST wrapper stuff, moving plugins, and reinstalling DP3...

as far as a mixer, the 828, and audiodesk are concerned, i have used audiodesk for over a year with very few problems, and found it lacking only in the midi dept. it is powerful, versatile mutitracking softwqare, and i think unless you plan to do midi sequencing, stick with audiodesk. spend the coin on a nice mic pre or something.

mixer w/828- i only did this to make the latency truly zero when i was recording multiple instruments at the same time and wanted to provide everyone with a headphone mix. i routed everyone through the mixer to the motu as discrete channels, and got the headphone mix from the mixer, instead of sending all the instruments out to 'analog 1-2' and monitoring that (with 'monitor record-enabled tracks' turned on), which crashed my mac because of throughput problems if the sample buffer size was too low (which reduces latency). with too large a buffer size, the latency was like 1/4 second, which means that you play a note and then hear it 1/4 second later, which makes it impossible to monitor what you're playing...

good luck-
dave
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Sun 15 Dec 2024, 10:45
- © MacMusic 1997-2008