MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visitors connected
Welcome Guest
> Sampler Vs Virtual, Opinions: MachFive; Spectrasonics; other
trip
post Thu 12 Jun 2003, 15:36
Post #1


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 11-Jun 03
From: Mamaroneck - US
Member No.: 19,521




Looking for high-end bass, percussion, and orchestral sounds. Has anyone used MOTU MachFive? or Spectrasonics? I'm using G4 OS X 10.2.6 and Digital Performer. Opinions appreciated.
Newbie.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Synthetic
post Fri 26 Sep 2003, 14:44
Post #2


Maniac Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 821
Joined: 25-Jun 01
From: Springfield - US
Member No.: 1,082




well I had a EMU ESI2000 for 4 months and sold it... was very un-mac friendly and just a hassle to load and save samples on it as well as manipulate and it was too time consuming. Then I got the ESX24 for Logic and I will never own another piece of hardware for sampling. The ESX24 was so much easier to deal with and much quicker to load, save, and create sample sets. I suspect this is true for all the new virtual synths though compared to hardware synths plus virtual cost a lot less. That is my 2 cents wink.gif


--------------------
----------------------------------------
<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'>Synthetic Tone</span>
Click above for totally original electronic music, art, & photos.
Click below to become an active member of the MacMusic.org site..

<span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>Become An Active Member</span>

G4 550mhz Tibook & Brand Spankin New Dual G5 2Ghz Power Mac with Tiger.
So long old OS9 apps :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version - Fri 13 Dec 2024, 04:56
- © MacMusic 1997-2008