Buying a Mac for Audio, How much trouble will this be? |
Wed 30 May 2001, 03:36
Post
#1
|
|
Group: Posts: 0 Joined: -- Member No.: 0 |
I need a computer for audio recording and I'm leaning towards a Mac, but I keep hearing all these things about software not running in OS X or 9.1. All new Macs come with OS X and 9.1, will I be able to run Logic audio/Cubase with this? I have a budget of about $2500(for computer ,with educational discount, and soundcard), what would you recomend(I don't need more than 2 inputs, but I do need midi)? Thanks in advance
|
|
|
Replies
Wed 27 Jun 2001, 08:10
Post
#2
|
|
Rookie Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 20-May 01 From: Port Charlotte Member No.: 658 |
I haven't heard of compatibility problems with any of the major software apps (Logic, Cubase, Performer, ProTools, etc.) & OS 9.1, and most of these will support OS X by the end of the year (if you believe what you read). If you only need 2 inputs, and don't need studio quality A/D conversion, the $35 iMic will work just fine ( no sound card needed). A basic USB/MIDI interface runs aboutt $60.
I just got one of the new iBooks & the MOTU 828 firewire interface (18 channels in & out) with AudioDesk recording software (Digital Performer without the MIDI) The whole set-up cost me less than $2300. |
|
|
Posts in this topic
Chan Buying a Mac for Audio Wed 30 May 2001, 03:36
rotten Absolutley, the Mac is the only way to go. Give th... Mon 11 Jun 2001, 16:33
milagro i use a powerPC 7500 upgraded with G3 card with pr... Sat 16 Jun 2001, 17:10
Synthetic tis true that OS X will not run hardly any music a... Mon 25 Jun 2001, 01:59
rotten Absolutley, the Mac is the only way to go. Give th... Mon 11 Jun 2001, 16:33
milagro i use a powerPC 7500 upgraded with G3 card with pr... Sat 16 Jun 2001, 17:10
Synthetic tis true that OS X will not run hardly any music a... Mon 25 Jun 2001, 01:59
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: