Dynaudio Or Adam?, Opinions for Rock/Pop mixing. |
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7e43/f7e43d7cd8fef43dfc41109dfc4b6df30ebe1c7d" alt="Start new topic" |
Replies
|
Fri 14 Apr 2006, 04:17
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7521/a75210c6010277a5142887cbd50245d720d7da4f" alt=""
Moderator In Chief (MIC)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d4db/3d4dbfcaba0b728e6fb8db4afd93448c950ed397" alt="Group Icon"
Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d979/6d979d5af4a3f0187575d6735dc85e5193e3af06" alt=""
|
Dynaudio, good all-rounder, good stereo, not tiring, but depending of the room, the BM15a may be better. ADAM, pin point sound (transients to kill), good stereo, though the midfield are preferred. Their revealing tendency can be surprising. They a used in some mastering facilities. The most interesting part of the ADAM range is more expensive than the BM6a. if I had the BM6a budget, I'd go BM6a, ADAM is a better contender in the bigger models (sub no more mandatory). Now the new models may be better suited for competition. But as they were new at frankfurt, I've got to hear them still, maybe at the AES in Paris. Check the Focal too (I have yet to hear them but they're battling ground with ADAM, can't stop hearing about them)
This post has been edited by lepetitmartien: Sat 15 Apr 2006, 02:41
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Fri 25 Mar 2011, 23:17
|
SuperHero
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02407/02407c51105e5e757eb84ecdd6f9f1693996ae1d" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02407/02407c51105e5e757eb84ecdd6f9f1693996ae1d" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02407/02407c51105e5e757eb84ecdd6f9f1693996ae1d" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02407/02407c51105e5e757eb84ecdd6f9f1693996ae1d" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02407/02407c51105e5e757eb84ecdd6f9f1693996ae1d" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02407/02407c51105e5e757eb84ecdd6f9f1693996ae1d" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02407/02407c51105e5e757eb84ecdd6f9f1693996ae1d" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02407/02407c51105e5e757eb84ecdd6f9f1693996ae1d" alt="*"
Group: Members
Posts: 4,781
Joined: 19-Nov 02
From: Bruxelles - BE
Member No.: 9,408
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d979/6d979d5af4a3f0187575d6735dc85e5193e3af06" alt=""
|
Citation (lepetitmartien @ ven 14 avr 2006, 04:17) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d492f/d492fa688e444817ef484b7351b4f90788c7c712" alt="*" Dynaudio, good all-rounder, good stereo, not tiring, but depending of the room, the BM15a may be better. ADAM, pin point sound (transients to kill), good stereo, though the midfield are preferred. Their revealing tendency can be surprising. They a used in some mastering facilities. The most interesting part of the ADAM range is more expensive than the BM6a. if I had the BM6a budget, I'd go BM6a, ADAM is a better contender in the bigger models (sub no more mandatory). Now the new models may be better suited for competition. But as they were new at frankfurt, I've got to hear them still, maybe at the AES in Paris. Check the Focal too (I have yet to hear them but they're battling ground with ADAM, can't stop hearing about them) +1
--------------------
MacPro dual 2.66 - 8 Go - SL10.6.6- DP 7.2.1 - RME FFCE 800 - URS, Sonnox, Stilwell, Nomad Factory, Kontakt 4.2.2, Trillian, Stylus, EZ drummer, SD2, UVIworkstation, Altiverb - KRK - JBL Neve 8801 - Brauner - Roland A-37, etc.
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|