 PMD620 hand-held compact field digital recorder, news |
|
|
|
_News_
|
 Sat 8 Dec 2007, 12:39
|
Visitors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
|
Tue 11 Dec 2007, 11:50
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 348
Joined: 10-Feb 06
From: Hamburg - DE
Member No.: 76,633
|
{lepetitmartien, Monday December 10, 2007. 07:05
renderingtodeath, save if you have a very good system/studio, you won't really hear 96 kHz samplerate or more, BUT you will sure eat up memory real estate, not to mention CPU and other issues. Samplerate only betters the available frequency range, it can have some interests but not for all, and certainly not for for everything. Moreover I don't know if it's the case, but take the clock of the converter is ultra-precise at 44 and 48 kHz but not at 96, what do you think it'll give?
The bit thing is, provided you work in 44 or 48 (this one for video in mind), much more important has it conditions dynamics and the noise floor. You'll benefit from a 24/44 recording way way way more than from a 16/44, 16/48, 16/96 etc.
In all, Marantz choice is right.
One interesting point is the memory! size possible of the beast, up to 2 TB!}
lepetitmartien, thank you. I wish I could have expressed myself like you did, with 'Facts and Figures'... I agree with you 100%.
Just because you have a fast car does not mean you can race in 'Formula 1', takes a 'Team'. Just because you have the "Newest Gear" does not AUTOMATICALLY improve your actual Recording or playing... It might sound a little better, but it won't automatically get you a Grammy or MTV Award...
Only great playing, great compositions, great connections or great luck does that. No one cares what computer, hardware or software you used...
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
News 
