 PMD620 hand-held compact field digital recorder, news |
|
|
|
_News_
|
 Sat 8 Dec 2007, 12:39
|
Visitors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
|
Mon 10 Dec 2007, 07:05
|
Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Group: Editors
Posts: 15,189
Joined: 23-Dec 01
From: Paris - FR
Member No.: 2,758
|
renderingtodeath, save if you have a very good system/studio, you won't really hear 96 kHz samplerate or more, BUT you will sure eat up memory real estate, not to mention CPU and other issues. Samplerate only betters the available frequency range, it can have some interests but not for all, and certainly not for for everything. Moreover I don't know if it's the case, but take the clock of the converter is ultra-precise at 44 and 48 kHz but not at 96, what do you think it'll give?  The bit thing is, provided you work in 44 or 48 (this one for video in mind), much more important has it conditions dynamics and the noise floor. You'll benefit from a 24/44 recording way way way more than from a 16/44, 16/48, 16/96 etc. In all, Marantz choice is right. One interesting point is the memory size possible of the beast, up to 2 TB!
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
News 
