 Installing Jaguar Should've Been Easy, But..., UNIX - a brave new world...? |
  Thu 7 Nov 2002, 22:51
Post
#1
|
|
 Junior Member  Group: Members Posts: 103 Joined: 30-Oct 02 From: Los Angeles - US Member No.: 8,882  |
UNIX (Mac OS X Jaguar 10.2) has been nothing but a nightmare to install on my dual 1 gig mac...
 I'm still struggling to get it on a separate 10 gig partition on my ata barracuda...I have never before experienced such a f***ed up install scenario...it kept me up till 4am last night...should've bin straightforward...  The installer craps out after getting past the "select language" stage...hmm. I thought it was a dodgy install disc, but it worked fine on a titanium laptop...I feel there is WAY more than meets the eye with this UNIX based beast...mmm...  I think UNIX is (once we all have accumulated knowledge of how it actually BEHAVES) a (very?) stable platform...but as for it leaving residual "invisible to OS9" files lying around on one's HD after lobbing everything visible that was OSX beta into the trashcan (I did this with beta OSX a while back when I first bought the dual 1 gig - I didn't want it on the same drive as my tried & trusted OS9) it has the ability to really mess with your computer's data in a real PHANTOM kind of a way when you try to do a fresh install of Jaguar (on a separate HD) simply because OSX beta used to be on the boot drive...aaargh! This appears to be the problem I'm having...  Personally, I feel that it was not the best move by Jobs & Co to actually have OSX (Beta) pre-installed alongside OS9 on the new G4's out of the box...we customers should've been given the option ourselves; ie: OS9 OR OSX ONLY on the boot drive to start with, ta very much, but no, TWO completely (alien to each other in terms of their kernels, source code etc) residing on the same drive...?! I guess that's what happens when one wants to sell truckloads of computers to people with a promise of "stability", "backwards" compatibility (er..) and a nice "windows style front end" presentation to attract the PC crowd...but what about existing mac people like myself? I should have been given the option to have either one or the other OS on the machine I bought...hmm..trying to please everybody can backfire on the existing mac customer, it would appear...  My only hope is that by backing up all of my s**t from my OS9 boot drive, and then doing a low level format to it(ugh...all those registrations and serial numbers that have to be reactivated...arg) will hopefully get rid of anything that is invisible beta UNIX off my damned boot drive!! Then, maybe, I will be able to install Jaguar without a problem....thanks, Apple. If all that doesn't work, I shall get myself a psychiatrist and send the bill to Steve Jobs... end of bitter rant... Anyone else experienced such outlandish install behaviour on their desktop G4's as a result of previously lobbing everything "visible" that was OSX off their boot drive when they first bought their desktop G4? Any hard earned advice to offer...?
-------------------- Nobody can take from you what you give freely.
|
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
 Fri 8 Nov 2002, 00:33
Post
#2
|
|
 Maniac Member Group: Members Posts: 899 Joined: 12-Oct 01 From: Kirkland Member No.: 2,002 |
Check the Apple site, some Macs require a firmware upgrade before Jaguar can be installed.
Are you booting from the CD? can't install from OS9. My install worked flawlessly on my G4/400 -------------------- G-Dub
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Teiwaz Installing Jaguar Should've Been Easy, But... Thu 7 Nov 2002, 22:51
Soif Hi teiwaz
The painless way to have OSX installed ... Fri 8 Nov 2002, 02:02 Teiwaz Soif, thank you for your indispensable help! V... Fri 8 Nov 2002, 06:30 Teiwaz Well, after all, it turns out that my G4's int... Wed 13 Nov 2002, 08:40 Presto Nice (?) to hear how competent your Apple sales/te... Thu 14 Nov 2002, 19:44
Teiwaz I can believe it!! They're everywhere,... Fri 15 Nov 2002, 12:05 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
